Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
- Did you mean:
- bliss%3a%2281.68 computereinsatz in unterricht und ausbildung%22 2
- bliss%3a%2181.68 computereinsatz in unterricht und ausbildung%22 2
- bliss%3a%2281.68 computereinsatz in unterrichts und ausbildung%22 2
- bliss%3a%2281.68 computereinsatzes in unterricht und ausbildung%22 2
- bross%3a%2281.68 computereinsatz in unterricht und ausbildung%22 2
-
Bodenreider, O.; Bean, C.A.: Relationships among knowledge structures : vocabulary integration within a subject domain (2001)
0.00
0.001682769 = product of: 0.010096614 = sum of: 0.010096614 = weight(_text_:in in 1145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.010096614 = score(doc=1145,freq=4.0), product of: 0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of: 1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218) 0.043654136 = queryNorm 0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 1145, product of: 2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of: 4.0 = termFreq=4.0 1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218) 0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1145) 0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- The structure of terminology systems can be seen as one way to organize knowledge. This paper focuses an three types of relationships among terms: synonymy, hierarchical relationships, and explicit mapping relationships. Examples drawn from various medical vocabularies illustrate each type of relationship. The integration of disparate terminological knowledge structures in the Unified Medical Language System is presented and discussed.
- Source
- Relationships in the organization of knowledge. Eds.: Bean, C.A. u. R. Green
-
Green, R.; Bean, C.A.: Aligning systems of relationships (2006)
0.00
0.0011898974 = product of: 0.0071393843 = sum of: 0.0071393843 = weight(_text_:in in 4949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.0071393843 = score(doc=4949,freq=2.0), product of: 0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of: 1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218) 0.043654136 = queryNorm 0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 4949, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218) 0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4949) 0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- The lateral relations of Neelameghan and Raghavan are mapped to their closest correspondents in FrameNet. Analvsis of this alignment highlights important characteristics of each system of relationships and reveals varying degrees of compatibility between them.