Rügenhagen, M.; Beck, T.S.; Sartorius, E.J.: Information integrity in the era of Fake News : ein neuer Studienschwerpunkt für wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken und Forschungseinrichtungen (2020)
0.00
0.003116655 = product of:
0.023374911 = sum of:
0.017793551 = weight(_text_:und in 5858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017793551 = score(doc=5858,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 5858, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5858)
0.0055813594 = product of:
0.011162719 = sum of:
0.011162719 = weight(_text_:information in 5858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011162719 = score(doc=5858,freq=4.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 5858, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5858)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
- Abstract
- In this article we report on an experiment that tested how useful library-based guidelines are for measuring the integrity of information in the era of fake news. We found that the usefulness of these guidelines depends on at least three factors: weighting indicators (criteria), clear instructions, and context-specificity.
- Source
- Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 44(2020) H.1, S.255-261
Rügenhagen, M.; Beck, T.S.; Sartorius, E.J.: Information integrity in the era of Fake News : an experiment using library guidelines to judge information integrity (2020)
0.00
0.0025890246 = product of:
0.019417683 = sum of:
0.012581941 = weight(_text_:und in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012581941 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
0.006835742 = product of:
0.013671484 = sum of:
0.013671484 = weight(_text_:information in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013671484 = score(doc=113,freq=6.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
- Abstract
- In this article we report on an experiment that tested how useful library-based guidelines are for measuring the integrity of information in the era of fake news. We found that the usefulness of these guidelines depends on at least three factors: weighting indicators (criteria), clear instructions, and context-specificity.
- Source
- Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 44(2020) H.1, S.34-53
