Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Becker, C."
  1. Becker, C.; Rauber, A.: Decision criteria in digital preservation : what to measure and how (2011) 0.02 
    0.022019787 = product of:
  0.110098936 = sum of:
    0.110098936 = weight(_text_:objects in 4456) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.110098936 = score(doc=4456,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.37497213 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 4456, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4456)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The enormous amount of valuable information that is produced today and needs to be made available over the long-term has led to increased efforts in scalable, automated solutions for long-term digital preservation. The mission of preservation planning is to define the optimal actions to ensure future access to digital content and react to changes that require adjustments in repository operations. Considerable effort has been spent in the past on defining, implementing, and validating a framework and system for preservation planning. This article sheds light on the actual decision criteria and influence factors to be considered when choosing digital preservation actions. It is based on an extensive evaluation of case studies on preservation planning for a range of different types of objects with partners from different institutional backgrounds. We categorize decision criteria from a number of real-world decision-making instances in a taxonomy. We show that a majority of the criteria can be evaluated by applying automated measurements under realistic conditions, and demonstrate that controlled experimentation and automated measurements can be used to substantially improve repeatability of decisions and reduce the effort needed to evaluate preservation components. The presented measurement framework enables scalable preservation and monitoring and supports trust in preservation decisions because extensive evidence is produced in a reproducible, automated way and documented as the basis of decision making in a standardized form.
  2. Bizer, C.; Lehmann, J.; Kobilarov, G.; Auer, S.; Becker, C.; Cyganiak, R.; Hellmann, S.: DBpedia: a crystallization point for the Web of Data. (2009) 0.01 
    0.008554155 = product of:
  0.042770773 = sum of:
    0.042770773 = weight(_text_:7 in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042770773 = score(doc=1643,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.233712 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.18300632 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Journal of Web semantics: science, services and agents on the World Wide Web, no.7, S.154-165
  3. Maemura, E.; Moles, N.; Becker, C.: Organizational assessment frameworks for digital preservation : a literature review and mapping (2017) 0.01 
    0.008554155 = product of:
  0.042770773 = sum of:
    0.042770773 = weight(_text_:7 in 3743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042770773 = score(doc=3743,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.233712 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.07054885 = queryNorm
        0.18300632 = fieldWeight in 3743, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3743)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.7, S.1619-1637

Authors

Years