Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Beghtol, C."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992) 0.03
    0.02754241 = product of:
      0.05508482 = sum of:
        0.02946245 = weight(_text_:for in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02946245 = score(doc=5830,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.33190575 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
        0.025622372 = product of:
          0.051244743 = sum of:
            0.051244743 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051244743 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16556148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047278564 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper examnines various isues that arise in establishing a theoretical basis for an experimental fiction analysis system. It analyzes the warrants of fiction and of works about fiction. From this analysis, it derives classificatory requirements for a fiction system. Classificatory techniques that may contribute to the specification of data elements in fiction are suggested
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:08
    Source
    Classification research for knowledge representation and organization. Proc. 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991. Ed. by N.J. Williamson u. M. Hudon
  2. Beghtol, C.: 'Itself an education' classification systems, theory, and research in the information studies curriculum (1997) 0.00
    0.00455724 = product of:
      0.01822896 = sum of:
        0.01822896 = weight(_text_:for in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01822896 = score(doc=666,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.20535621 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The interdisciplinary field of information studies requires an eclectic and imaginative curriculum. Future information professionals need intellectual tools that will enable them to adapt to changed social and technological environments. In this situation, the study of classification, including both principles application for current bibliographic systems and principles of construction that could be used to develop new systems for bibliographic and non bibliographic materials, is one way to equip students with the balanced flexibility to adapt to changing needs. Knowledge of the organization of knowledge is basic to any kind of information work
  3. Beghtol, C.: Stories : applications of narrative discourse analysis to issues in information storage and retrieval (1997) 0.00
    0.00455724 = product of:
      0.01822896 = sum of:
        0.01822896 = weight(_text_:for in 5844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01822896 = score(doc=5844,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.20535621 = fieldWeight in 5844, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5844)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The arts, humanities, and social sciences commonly borrow concepts and methods from the sciences, but interdisciplinary borrowing seldom occurs in the opposite direction. Research on narrative discourse is relevant to problems of documentary storage and retrieval, for the arts and humanities in particular, but also for other broad areas of knowledge. This paper views the potential application of narrative discourse analysis to information storage and retrieval problems from 2 perspectives: 1) analysis and comparison of narrative documents in all disciplines may be simplified if fundamental categories that occur in narrative documents can be isolated; and 2) the possibility of subdividing the world of knowledge initially into narrative and non-narrative documents is explored with particular attention to Werlich's work on text types
  4. Beghtol, C.: General classification systems : structural principles for multidisciplinary specification (1998) 0.00
    0.0039062058 = product of:
      0.015624823 = sum of:
        0.015624823 = weight(_text_:for in 44) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015624823 = score(doc=44,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.17601961 = fieldWeight in 44, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=44)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    In this century, knowledge creation, production, dissemination and use have changed profoundly. Intellectual and physical barriers have been substantially reduced by the rise of multidisciplinarity and by the influence of computerization, particularly by the spread of the World Wide Web (WWW). Bibliographic classification systems need to respond to this situation. Three possible strategic responses are described: 1) adopting an existing system; 2) adapting an existing system; and 3) finding new structural principles for classification systems. Examples of these three responses are given. An extended example of the third option uses the knowledge outline in the Spectrum of Britannica Online to suggest a theory of "viewpoint warrant" that could be used to incorporate differing perspectives into general classification systems
  5. Beghtol, C.: Within, among, between : three faces of interdisciplinarity (1995) 0.00
    0.0032224553 = product of:
      0.012889821 = sum of:
        0.012889821 = weight(_text_:for in 1297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012889821 = score(doc=1297,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.14520876 = fieldWeight in 1297, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1297)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Connectedness: information, systems, people, organizations. Proceedings of CAIS/ACSI 95, the proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Canadian Association for Information Science. Ed. by Hope A. Olson and Denis B. Ward
  6. Beghtol, C.: Domain analysis, literary warrant, and consensus : the case of fiction studies (1995) 0.00
    0.0027621046 = product of:
      0.0110484185 = sum of:
        0.0110484185 = weight(_text_:for in 7728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0110484185 = score(doc=7728,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.12446466 = fieldWeight in 7728, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7728)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 46(1995) no.1, S.30-44
  7. Beghtol, C.: Knowledge domains : multidisciplinarity and bibliographic classification systems (1998) 0.00
    0.0027621046 = product of:
      0.0110484185 = sum of:
        0.0110484185 = weight(_text_:for in 2028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0110484185 = score(doc=2028,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08876751 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047278564 = queryNorm
            0.12446466 = fieldWeight in 2028, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2028)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliographic classification systems purport to organize the world of knowledge for information storage and retrieval purposes in libraries and bibliographies, both manual and online. The major systems that have predominated during the 20th century were originally predicated on the academic disciplines. This structural principle is no longer adequate because multidisciplinray knowledge production has overtaken more traditional disciplinary perspectives and produced communities of cooperation whose documents cannot be accomodated in a disciplinary structure. This paper addresses the problems the major classifications face, reports some attempts to revise these systems to accomodate multidisciplinary works more appropriately, and describes some theoretical research perspectives that attempt to reorient classification research toward the pluralistic needs of multidisciplinary knowledge creation and the perspectives of different discourse communities. Traditionally, the primary desiderata of classification systems were mutual exclusivity and joint exhaustivity. The need to respond to multidisciplinary research may mean that hospitality will replace mutual exclusivity and joint exhaustivity as the most needed and useful characteristics of classification systems in both theory and practice