Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Beghtol, C."
  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  1. Beghtol, C.: Semantic validity : concepts of warrants in bibliographic classification systems (1986) 0.00 
    0.0042401487 = product of:
  0.05936208 = sum of:
    0.05936208 = weight(_text_:semantic in 3487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05936208 = score(doc=3487,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.105508775 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025375739 = queryNorm
        0.56262696 = fieldWeight in 3487, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3487)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Abstract
    This paper argues that the semantic axis of bibliographic classification systems can be found in the various warrants that have been used to justify the utility of classification systems. Classificationists, theorists, and critics have emphasized the syntactic aspects of classification theories and systems, but a number of semantic warrants can be identified. The evolution of four semantic warrants is traced through the development of twentieth-century classification theory: literary warrant, scientific/philosophical warrant, educational warrant, and cultural warrant. It is concluded that further examination of semantic warrants might make possible a rationalized approach to the creation of classification systems for particular uses. The attention of scholars on faceted schemes and classificatory structures had heretofore pulled our attention to the syntactic aspects (e.g., concept division and citation order), with semantics being considered more or less a question of the terms and their relationships and somewhat taken for granted, or at least construed as a unitary aspect. Attention is on the choice of the classes and their meaning, as well as their connection to the world, and not so much on their syntactic relationship. This notion is developed by providing an historical and conceptual overview of the various kinds of warrant discernible in working with bibliographic systems. In Beghtol's definition, warrant concerns more than just the selection of terms, but rather the mapping of a classification system to the context and uses.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: Kwasnik, B.H.: Semantic warrant: a pivotal concept for our field. In: Knowledge organization. 37(2010) no.2, S.106-110.
  2. Beghtol, C.: Relationships in classificatory structure and meaning (2001) 0.00 
    0.0020772403 = product of:
  0.029081361 = sum of:
    0.029081361 = weight(_text_:semantic in 1138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029081361 = score(doc=1138,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.105508775 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025375739 = queryNorm
        0.2756298 = fieldWeight in 1138, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1138)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Abstract
    In a changing information environment, we need to reassess each element of bibliographic control, including classification theories and systems. Every classification system is a theoretical construct imposed an "reality." The classificatory relationships that are assumed to be valuable have generally received less attention than the topics included in the systems. Relationships are functions of both the syntactic and semantic axes of classification systems, and both explicit and implicit relationships are discussed. Examples are drawn from a number of different systems, both bibliographic and non-bibliographic, and the cultural warrant (i. e., the sociocultural context) of classification systems is examined. The part-whole relationship is discussed as an example of a universally valid concept that is treated as a component of the cultural warrant of a classification system.
  3. Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society (2004) 0.00 
    3.0696986E-4 = product of:
  0.004297578 = sum of:
    0.004297578 = product of:
      0.017190311 = sum of:
        0.017190311 = weight(_text_:22 in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017190311 = score(doc=3483,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08886151 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025375739 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Pages
    S.19-22
  4. Beghtol, C.: Classification for information retrieval and classification for knowledge discovery : relationships between "professional" and "naïve" classifications (2003) 0.00 
    2.527411E-4 = product of:
  0.003538375 = sum of:
    0.003538375 = product of:
      0.0141535 = sum of:
        0.0141535 = weight(_text_:j in 3021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0141535 = score(doc=3021,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.080631316 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025375739 = queryNorm
            0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 3021, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3021)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Footnote
    Vgl. Stellungnahme dazu in: Hjoerland, B., J. Nicolaisen: Scientific and scholarly classifications are not "naïve": a comment to Beghtol (2003). In: Knowledge organization. 31(2004) no.1, S.55-61.
  5. Beghtol, C.: Response to Hjoerland and Nicolaisen (2004) 0.00 
    1.7691877E-4 = product of:
  0.0024768626 = sum of:
    0.0024768626 = product of:
      0.0099074505 = sum of:
        0.0099074505 = weight(_text_:j in 3536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0099074505 = score(doc=3536,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.080631316 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025375739 = queryNorm
            0.12287348 = fieldWeight in 3536, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3536)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Hjoerland, B., J. Nicolaisen: Scientific and scholarly classifications are not "naïve": a comment to Beghtol (2003). In: Knowledge organization. 31(2004) no.1, S.55-61. - Vgl. die Erwiderung von Nicolaisen und Hjoerland in KO 31(2004) no.3, S.199-201.

Years