Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

Large, A.; Beheshti, J.; Breuleux, A.: Multimedia and comprehension : a cognitive study (1994) 0.00
```
0.0028428852 = product of:
  0.011371541 = sum of:
    0.011371541 = weight(_text_:information in 7754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011371541 = score(doc=7754,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.056416616 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03213747 = queryNorm
        0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 7754, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7754)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

Tests were carried out on 120 grade 6 students to compare Compton's Multimedia Encyclopedia on CD-ROM and its printe equivalent in terms of students' ability to recall information and to draw inferences from it. Between-subject varaibles were 3 presentation conditions (printed text with illustrations, text-on-screen, and multimedia-text, still images, and animation) and a retrieval condition (topic retrieved before viewing / topic presented without retrieval). Within-subject variables were text complexity (complex or simple), text type (descriptive or procedural), and measure (propositions recalled versus propositions inferred). Presentation conditions produced no significant main effect although text-on-screen resulted in somewhat higher recall and multimedia resulted in somewhat higher inference scores. Multimedia had the greatest effect in the case of simple topics, and especially the simple procedural topic

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45(1994) no.7, S.515-528

Theme

Information

Large, A.; Beheshti, J.; Breuleux, A.; Renaud, A.: Multimedia and comprehension : the relationship among text, animation, and captions (1995) 0.00

0.0016413406 = product of:
  0.006565362 = sum of:
    0.006565362 = weight(_text_:information in 5306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006565362 = score(doc=5306,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.056416616 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03213747 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5306, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5306)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 46(1995) no.5, S.340-347

Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors