Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Bergman, O."
  1. Bergman, O.; Beyth-Marom, R.; Nachmias, R.: ¬The user-subjective approach to personal information management systems (2003) 0.00 
    0.004871491 = product of:
  0.024357455 = sum of:
    0.024357455 = weight(_text_:b in 1714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024357455 = score(doc=1714,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1244487 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03512561 = queryNorm
        0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 1714, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1714)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    In this article we suggest a user-subjective approach to Personal Information Management (PIM) system design. This approach advocates that PIM systems relate to the subjective value-added attributes that the user gives to the data stored in the PIM system. These attributes should facilitate system use: help the user find the information item again, recall it when needed, and use it effectively in the next interaction with the item. Driven from the user-subjective approach are theee generic principles which are described and discussed: (a) The subjective classification principle, stating that all information items related to the same subjective topic should be classified together regardless of their technological format; (b) The subjective importance principle, proposing that the subjective importance of information should determine its degree of visual salience and accessibility; and (c) The subjective context principle, suggesting that information should be retrieved and viewed by the user in the same context in which it was previously used. We claim that these principles are only sporadically implemented in operating systems currently available an personal computers, and demonstrate alternatives for interface design.
  2. Bergman, O.; Whittaker, S.; Falk, N.: Shared files : the retrieval perspective (2014) 0.00 
    0.0011897589 = product of:
  0.005948794 = sum of:
    0.005948794 = product of:
      0.023795176 = sum of:
        0.023795176 = weight(_text_:22 in 1495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023795176 = score(doc=1495,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1230039 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03512561 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1495, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1495)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    People who are collaborating can share files in two main ways: performing Group Information Management (GIM) using a common repository or performing Personal Information Management (PIM) by distributing files as e-mail attachments and storing them in personal repositories. There is a trend toward using common repositories with many organizations encouraging workers to use GIM to avoid duplication of files and management. So far, PIM and GIM have been studied by different research communities, so their effectiveness for file retrieval has not yet been systematically compared. We compared PIM and GIM in a large-scale elicited personal information retrieval study. We asked 275 users to retrieve 860 of their own shared files, testing the effect of sharing method on success and efficiency of retrieval. Participants preferred PIM over GIM. More important, PIM retrieval was more successful: Participants using GIM failed to find 22% of their files compared with 13% failures using PIM. This may be because active organization aids retrieval: When using personally created folders, the failure percentage was 65% lower than when using default folders (e.g., My Documents), and more than 5 times lower than when using folders created by others for GIM. Theoretical reasons for this are discussed.
  3. Bergman, O.; Israeli, T.; Whittaker, S.: Factors hindering shared files retrieval (2020) 0.00 
    0.0011897589 = product of:
  0.005948794 = sum of:
    0.005948794 = product of:
      0.023795176 = sum of:
        0.023795176 = weight(_text_:22 in 5843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023795176 = score(doc=5843,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1230039 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03512561 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5843, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5843)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Authors

Years