Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Besselaar, P. van den"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Besselaar, P. van den: Empirical evidence of self-organization? (2003) 0.01
    0.0063645868 = product of:
      0.01909376 = sum of:
        0.01909376 = product of:
          0.057281278 = sum of:
            0.057281278 = weight(_text_:network in 1235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057281278 = score(doc=1235,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.29521978 = fieldWeight in 1235, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1235)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In a recent paper in this journal, Loet Leydesdorff and Gaston Heimeriks (2001, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52, 1262-1294.) argue that biotechnology develops in a self-organizational mode, through interaction between the intellectual structure and the institutional network of the research field. This claim is empirically supported by a multivariate analysis of documents from core biotechnology journals. One unexpected finding in this paper is the relationship between the title words of documents and the region of their origin. This claim requires examination because, as will be shown, it seems to be an artifact of the method used. If this is so, it undermines the authors' theoretical claim that the production of knowledge is a self-organizing process.
  2. Wen, B.; Horlings, E.; Zouwen, M. van der; Besselaar, P. van den: Mapping science through bibliometric triangulation : an experimental approach applied to water research (2017) 0.00
    0.003309216 = product of:
      0.009927647 = sum of:
        0.009927647 = product of:
          0.029782942 = sum of:
            0.029782942 = weight(_text_:29 in 3437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029782942 = score(doc=3437,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043569047 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3437, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3437)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    16.11.2017 13:29:12