Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Bianchini, C."
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Bianchini, C.: Colon Classification and Nuovo Soggettario : the case of the Library of the Natural History Museum of Udine, Italy (2012) 0.02
    0.016720567 = product of:
      0.06688227 = sum of:
        0.05077526 = weight(_text_:case in 4889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05077526 = score(doc=4889,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.29144385 = fieldWeight in 4889, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4889)
        0.01610701 = product of:
          0.03221402 = sum of:
            0.03221402 = weight(_text_:22 in 4889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03221402 = score(doc=4889,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13876937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03962768 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4889, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4889)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:05:47
  2. Bianchini, C.; Zappalà, P.: ISBD and mechanical musical devices : a case study of the Department of Musicology and Cultural Heritage, University of Pavia, Italy (2014) 0.01
    0.0074047255 = product of:
      0.059237804 = sum of:
        0.059237804 = weight(_text_:case in 2002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059237804 = score(doc=2002,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1742197 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.34001783 = fieldWeight in 2002, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2002)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
  3. Bianchini, C.; Guerrini, M.: ¬A turning point for catalogs : Ranganathan's possible point of view (2015) 0.00
    0.0035436437 = product of:
      0.02834915 = sum of:
        0.02834915 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02834915 = score(doc=2006,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 2006, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2006)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Since the end of the last century, catalogs have been changing more and more quickly. This change is following a recognizable course, beginning with the publication of Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records, passing through the reorganization of international cataloging principles, the revision of international standards of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (International Standard for Bibliographic Description), and the foundation of new cataloging codes, such as Resource Description and Access. While principles, models, and rules are well established, bibliographic formats seem to be a bottleneck and users seem far from libraries. This article aims to present an overview of current changes, potential convergences, developments, and weak points from Ranganathan's point of view.
  4. Bianchini, C.; Guerrini, M.: RDA: a content standard to ensure the quality of data : history of a relationship (2016) 0.00
    0.0035436437 = product of:
      0.02834915 = sum of:
        0.02834915 = weight(_text_:libraries in 2948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02834915 = score(doc=2948,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13017908 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03962768 = queryNorm
            0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 2948, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2948)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    RDA Resource Description and Access are guidelines for description and access to resources designed for digital environment and released, in its first version, in 2010. RDA is based on FRBR and its derived models, that focus on users' needs and on resources of any kind of content, medium and carrier. The paper discusses relevance of main features of RDA for the future role of libraries in the context of semantic web and metadata creation and exchange. The paper aims to highlight many consequences deriving from RDA being a content standard, and in particular the change from record management to data management, differences among the two functions realized by RDA (to identify and to relate entities) and functions realized by other standard such as MARC21 (to archive data) and ISB (to visualize data) and show how, as all these functions are necessary for the catalog, RDA needs to be integrated by other rules and standard and that these tools allow the fulfilment of the variation principle defined by S.R. Ranganathan.