Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Bianchini, C."
  1. Bianchini, C.; Bargioni, S.: Automated classification using linked open data : a case study on faceted classification and Wikidata (2021) 0.03
    0.03257599 = sum of:
      0.030150732 = product of:
        0.12060293 = sum of:
          0.12060293 = weight(_text_:authors in 724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12060293 = score(doc=724,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.2418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 724, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=724)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.0024252585 = product of:
        0.004850517 = sum of:
          0.004850517 = weight(_text_:s in 724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.004850517 = score(doc=724,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 724, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=724)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Wikidata gadget, CCLitBox, for the automated classification of literary authors and works by a faceted classification and using Linked Open Data (LOD) is presented. The tool reproduces the classification algorithm of class O Literature of the Colon Classification and uses data freely available in Wikidata to create Colon Classification class numbers. CCLitBox is totally free and enables any user to classify literary authors and their works; it is easily accessible to everybody; it uses LOD from Wikidata but missing data for classification can be freely added if necessary; it is readymade for any cooperative and networked project.
  2. Bianchini, C.; Willer, M.: ISBD resource and Its description in the context of the Semantic Web (2014) 0.02
    0.023745045 = sum of:
      0.021319786 = product of:
        0.085279144 = sum of:
          0.085279144 = weight(_text_:authors in 1998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.085279144 = score(doc=1998,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 1998, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1998)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.0024252585 = product of:
        0.004850517 = sum of:
          0.004850517 = weight(_text_:s in 1998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.004850517 = score(doc=1998,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1998, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1998)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article explores the question "What is an International Standard for Bibliographic Description (ISBD) resource in the context of the Semantic Web, and what is the relationship of its description to the linked data?" This question is discussed against the background of the dichotomy between the description and access using the Semantic Web differentiation of the three logical layers: real-world objects, web of data, and special purpose (bibliographic) data. The representation of bibliographic data as linked data is discussed, distinguishing the description of a resource from the iconic/objective and the informational/subjective viewpoints. In the conclusion, the authors give views on possible directions of future development of the ISBD.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 52(2014) no.8, S.869-887
  3. Bianchini, C.: Colon Classification and Nuovo Soggettario : the case of the Library of the Natural History Museum of Udine, Italy (2012) 0.02
    0.023643933 = product of:
      0.047287866 = sum of:
        0.047287866 = sum of:
          0.0041575856 = weight(_text_:s in 4889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0041575856 = score(doc=4889,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 4889, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4889)
          0.043130282 = weight(_text_:22 in 4889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043130282 = score(doc=4889,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18579373 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4889, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4889)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:05:47
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.23-28
  4. Bianchini, C.; Guerrini, M.: International cataloguing tradition and Italian rules : common ground and specific features (2007) 0.02
    0.016960748 = sum of:
      0.01522842 = product of:
        0.06091368 = sum of:
          0.06091368 = weight(_text_:authors in 258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06091368 = score(doc=258,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 258, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=258)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.0017323275 = product of:
        0.003464655 = sum of:
          0.003464655 = weight(_text_:s in 258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.003464655 = score(doc=258,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 258, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=258)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Many current cataloguing codes have their roots in a common tradition started by the 1961 Paris International Conference on Cataloguing Principles-ICCP. Since 1961, the construction of new national codes had been based on the sharing of cataloguing principles, on agreements for international cooperation, and on a common tradition. The new technological and international environment suggests, more and more, a redesign of those principles to include more suitable features and to assert firmly that the highest principle is the convenience of the users of the catalogue. Within this framework, the authors analyze the Italian cataloguing tradition and its relationships with the international tradition and recount the main activities towards a revision of the present Italian code-Regole italiane di catalogazione per autori RICA. The paper shows that, since the first Italian rules written by Fumagalli, special attention has been paid to the international tradition (in particular toward Panizzi's rules). After describing the relationships among the international trends and the Italian codes of 1922, 1956 and 1979, the paper deals with the recent works of the new Commission that, since 1997, has started to revise RICA. The paper concludes by reflecting on the Italian position in the debate first on the ISBD and then on the new entity-relationship models.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 44(2007) nos.1/2, S.131-150
  5. Bianchini, C.; Guerrini, M.: ¬The international diffusion of RDA : a wide overview on the new guidelines (2016) 0.00
    0.001385862 = product of:
      0.002771724 = sum of:
        0.002771724 = product of:
          0.005543448 = sum of:
            0.005543448 = weight(_text_:s in 2944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005543448 = score(doc=2944,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2944, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2944)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Jlis.it. 7(2016) no.2, S.1-5
  6. Bianchini, C.; Zappalà, P.: ISBD and mechanical musical devices : a case study of the Department of Musicology and Cultural Heritage, University of Pavia, Italy (2014) 0.00
    0.0012126293 = product of:
      0.0024252585 = sum of:
        0.0024252585 = product of:
          0.004850517 = sum of:
            0.004850517 = weight(_text_:s in 2002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004850517 = score(doc=2002,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 2002, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2002)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 52(2014) no.8, S.940-960
  7. Bianchini, C.: Arrangement of FRBR entities in Colon Classification call numbers (2012) 0.00
    0.0010393964 = product of:
      0.0020787928 = sum of:
        0.0020787928 = product of:
          0.0041575856 = sum of:
            0.0041575856 = weight(_text_:s in 1914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0041575856 = score(doc=1914,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1914, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1914)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 50(2012) no.5/7, S.473-493
  8. Bianchini, C.; Guerrini, M.: ¬A turning point for catalogs : Ranganathan's possible point of view (2015) 0.00
    0.0010393964 = product of:
      0.0020787928 = sum of:
        0.0020787928 = product of:
          0.0041575856 = sum of:
            0.0041575856 = weight(_text_:s in 2006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0041575856 = score(doc=2006,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2006, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2006)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 53(2015) no.3/4, S.341-351
  9. Bianchini, C.; Guerrini, M.: RDA: a content standard to ensure the quality of data : history of a relationship (2016) 0.00
    0.0010393964 = product of:
      0.0020787928 = sum of:
        0.0020787928 = product of:
          0.0041575856 = sum of:
            0.0041575856 = weight(_text_:s in 2948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0041575856 = score(doc=2948,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2948, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2948)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Jlis.it. 7(2016) no.2, S.83-98