Rubel, A.; Biava, R.: ¬A framework for analyzing and comparing privacy states (2014)
0.04
0.040099498 = product of:
0.080198996 = sum of:
0.04883048 = weight(_text_:social in 1340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04883048 = score(doc=1340,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.26434162 = fieldWeight in 1340, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1340)
0.031368516 = product of:
0.06273703 = sum of:
0.06273703 = weight(_text_:aspects in 1340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06273703 = score(doc=1340,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.29962775 = fieldWeight in 1340, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1340)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This article develops a framework for analyzing and comparing privacy and privacy protections across (inter alia) time, place, and polity and for examining factors that affect privacy and privacy protection. This framework provides a method to describe precisely aspects of privacy and context and a flexible vocabulary and notation for such descriptions and comparisons. Moreover, it links philosophical and conceptual work on privacy to social science and policy work and accommodates different conceptions of the nature and value of privacy. The article begins with an outline of the framework. It then refines the view by describing a hypothetical application. Finally, it applies the framework to a real-world privacy issue-campaign finance disclosure laws in the United States and France. The article concludes with an argument that the framework offers important advantages to privacy scholarship and for privacy policy makers.
