Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Blair, D.C."
  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Blair, D.C.: Some thoughts on the reported results of TREC (2002) 0.00 
    0.001913537 = product of:
  0.003827074 = sum of:
    0.003827074 = product of:
      0.007654148 = sum of:
        0.007654148 = weight(_text_:a in 2583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007654148 = score(doc=2583,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046056706 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 2583, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2583)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The periodic TRECs - Text REtrieval Conferences - have reported the results of a variety of recall studies in large-scale document retrieval. While the efforts of TREC are noteworthy and laudable, there are reasons why its results, especially the recall values which are central to its conclusions, should be accepted with some caution.
    Type
    a