Blanchi, C.; Petrone, J.: Distributed interoperable metadata registry (2001)
0.07
0.074919865 = product of:
0.14983973 = sum of:
0.10995004 = weight(_text_:digital in 1228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10995004 = score(doc=1228,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20808177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.052751686 = queryNorm
0.5283983 = fieldWeight in 1228, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1228)
0.039889686 = weight(_text_:library in 1228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039889686 = score(doc=1228,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13870415 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052751686 = queryNorm
0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 1228, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1228)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Interoperability between digital libraries depends on effective sharing of metadata. Successful sharing of metadata requires common standards for metadata exchange. Previous efforts have focused on either defining a single metadata standard, such as Dublin Core, or building digital library middleware, such as Z39.50 or Stanford's Digital Library Interoperability Protocol. In this article, we propose a distributed architecture for managing metadata and metadata schema. Instead of normalizing all metadata and schema to a single format, we have focused on building a middleware framework that tolerates heterogeneity. By providing facilities for typing and dynamic conversion of metadata, our system permits continual introduction of new forms of metadata with minimal impact on compatibility.