Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0074184835 = product of:
  0.05192938 = sum of:
    0.009988253 = weight(_text_:information in 863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009988253 = score(doc=863,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 863, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=863)
    0.04194113 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04194113 = score(doc=863,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 863, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=863)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

LCSH

Information retrieval

Subject

Information retrieval

Theme

Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval

0.002118347 = product of:
  0.029656855 = sum of:
    0.029656855 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029656855 = score(doc=3578,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 3578, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3578)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Abstract

Examination of selected rules of the Anglo-American Cataloging Rules, Second Edition, 1988 revision, (AACR2) shows that the rules are oriented towards a paper-based catalog and are, at least to some extent, not suitable for a computer environment. Thorough examination of the objectives and principles of all aspects of cataloging in the computer age is suggested, followed by subsequent development of a new type of "enhanced" code which takes advantage of considerable work done by many ALA and other units in the area of computer-aided retrieval. This code should deal with traditional catalog code questions as well a subject retrieval, catalog design, and computer capabilities. Specific suggestions are made for each section of the proposed code.