Szpakowicz, S.; Bond, F.; Nakov, P.; Kim, S.N.: On the semantics of noun compounds (2013)
0.00
2.3021935E-4 = product of:
0.00345329 = sum of:
0.00345329 = product of:
0.00690658 = sum of:
0.00690658 = weight(_text_:information in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00690658 = score(doc=120,freq=2.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
- Abstract
- The noun compound - a sequence of nouns which functions as a single noun - is very common in English texts. No language processing system should ignore expressions like steel soup pot cover if it wants to be serious about such high-end applications of computational linguistics as question answering, information extraction, text summarization, machine translation - the list goes on. Processing noun compounds, however, is far from trouble-free. For one thing, they can be bracketed in various ways: is it steel soup, steel pot, or steel cover? Then there are relations inside a compound, annoyingly not signalled by any words: does pot contain soup or is it for cooking soup? These and many other research challenges are the subject of this special issue.
