Bordeaux, A.C.: Single, separate, or something in between : results of a survey on representing electronic serials in the catalog (2004/05)
0.04
0.043557227 = product of:
0.08711445 = sum of:
0.060314562 = weight(_text_:digital in 729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060314562 = score(doc=729,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.30507088 = fieldWeight in 729, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=729)
0.026799891 = weight(_text_:library in 729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026799891 = score(doc=729,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 729, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=729)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Binghamton University Libraries have used a single record to catalog both print and electronic serials for many years. Proliferation of access to electronic serials has caused the libraries to consider whether the current cataloging model is the best way to present electronic serial holdings to patrons. In order to assist with the decision whether to change current practice and, if so, what changes to make, the author undertook a surrey of current practice and perceptions regarding electronic serial record displays in the library catalog. This article describes current cataloging practice at Binghamton University, outlines the survey methodology, and presents and discusses the results of the survey.
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Profiles in digital information"
