Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Bordons, M."
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Costas, R.; Leeuwen, T.N. van; Bordons, M.: ¬A bibliometric classificatory approach for the study and assessment of research performance at the individual level : the effects of age on productivity and impact (2010) 0.01
    0.011728944 = product of:
      0.023457889 = sum of:
        0.011417762 = product of:
          0.04567105 = sum of:
            0.04567105 = weight(_text_:authors in 3700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04567105 = score(doc=3700,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15112379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033149805 = queryNorm
                0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 3700, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3700)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.012040127 = product of:
          0.024080254 = sum of:
            0.024080254 = weight(_text_:r in 3700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024080254 = score(doc=3700,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10973442 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033149805 = queryNorm
                0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 3700, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3700)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The authors set forth a general methodology for conducting bibliometric analyses at the micro level. It combines several indicators grouped into three factors or dimensions, which characterize different aspects of scientific performance. Different profiles or classes of scientists are described according to their research performance in each dimension. A series of results based on the findings from the application of this methodology to the study of Spanish National Research Council scientists in Spain in three thematic areas are presented. Special emphasis is made on the identification and description of top scientists from structural and bibliometric perspectives. The effects of age on the productivity and impact of the different classes of scientists are analyzed. The classificatory approach proposed herein may prove a useful tool in support of research assessment at the individual level and for exploring potential determinants of research success.
  2. Díaz-Faes, A.A.; Bordons, M.: Acknowledgments in scientific publications : presence in Spanish science and text patterns across disciplines (2014) 0.01
    0.010371577 = product of:
      0.020743154 = sum of:
        0.009514802 = product of:
          0.03805921 = sum of:
            0.03805921 = weight(_text_:authors in 1351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03805921 = score(doc=1351,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15112379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033149805 = queryNorm
                0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 1351, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1351)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.011228353 = product of:
          0.022456706 = sum of:
            0.022456706 = weight(_text_:22 in 1351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022456706 = score(doc=1351,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11608497 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033149805 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1351, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1351)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The acknowledgments in scientific publications are an important feature in the scholarly communication process. This research analyzes funding acknowledgment presence in scientific publications and introduces a novel approach for discovering text patterns by discipline in the acknowledgment section of papers. First, the presence of acknowledgments in 38,257 English-language papers published by Spanish researchers in 2010 is studied by subject area on the basis of the funding acknowledgment information available in the Web of Science database. Funding acknowledgments are present in two thirds of Spanish articles, with significant differences by subject area, number of authors, impact factor of journals, and, in one specific area, basic/applied nature of research. Second, the existence of specific acknowledgment patterns in English-language papers of Spanish researchers in 4 selected subject categories (cardiac and cardiovascular systems, economics, evolutionary biology, and statistics and probability) is explored through a combination of text mining and multivariate analyses. "Peer interactive communication" predominates in the more theoretical or social-oriented fields (statistics and probability, economics), whereas the recognition of technical assistance is more common in experimental research (evolutionary biology), and the mention of potential conflicts of interest emerges forcefully in the clinical field (cardiac and cardiovascular systems). The systematic inclusion of structured data about acknowledgments in journal articles and bibliographic databases would have a positive impact on the study of collaboration practices in science.
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:06:28
  3. Costas, R.; Leeuwen, T.N. van; Bordons, M.: Referencing patterns of individual researchers : do top scientists rely on more extensive information sources? (2012) 0.00
    0.0025083597 = product of:
      0.010033439 = sum of:
        0.010033439 = product of:
          0.020066878 = sum of:
            0.020066878 = weight(_text_:r in 516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020066878 = score(doc=516,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10973442 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033149805 = queryNorm
                0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 516, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=516)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)