Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Bornmann, L."
  • × author_ss:"Leydesdorff, L."
  1. Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: Mapping (USPTO) patent data using overlays to Google Maps (2012) 0.05
    0.053041074 = product of:
      0.10608215 = sum of:
        0.10608215 = product of:
          0.2121643 = sum of:
            0.2121643 = weight(_text_:maps in 288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2121643 = score(doc=288,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.7450137 = fieldWeight in 288, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=288)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A technique is developed using patent information available online (at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office) for the generation of Google Maps. The overlays indicate both the quantity and the quality of patents at the city level. This information is relevant for research questions in technology analysis, innovation studies, and evolutionary economics, as well as economic geography. The resulting maps can also be relevant for technological innovation policies and research and development management, because the U.S. market can be considered the leading market for patenting and patent competition. In addition to the maps, the routines provide quantitative data about the patents for statistical analysis. The cities on the map are colored according to the results of significance tests. The overlays are explored for the Netherlands as a "national system of innovations" and further elaborated in two cases of emerging technologies: ribonucleic acid interference (RNAi) and nanotechnology.
  2. Bornmann, L.; Leydesdorff, L.: Which cities produce more excellent papers than can be expected? : a new mapping approach, using Google Maps, based on statistical significance testing (2011) 0.03
    0.026520537 = product of:
      0.053041074 = sum of:
        0.053041074 = product of:
          0.10608215 = sum of:
            0.10608215 = weight(_text_:maps in 4767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10608215 = score(doc=4767,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.37250686 = fieldWeight in 4767, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4767)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.S.: ¬The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact (2019) 0.01
    0.010299506 = product of:
      0.020599011 = sum of:
        0.020599011 = product of:
          0.041198023 = sum of:
            0.041198023 = weight(_text_:22 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041198023 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8. 1.2019 18:22:45
  4. Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor : normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science (2011) 0.01
    0.008582922 = product of:
      0.017165843 = sum of:
        0.017165843 = product of:
          0.034331687 = sum of:
            0.034331687 = weight(_text_:22 in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034331687 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 12:51:07