Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Bornmann, L."
  • × author_ss:"Mutz, R."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014) 0.02
    0.018005218 = product of:
      0.036010437 = sum of:
        0.036010437 = product of:
          0.05401565 = sum of:
            0.0047490974 = weight(_text_:s in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0047490974 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
            0.049266554 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049266554 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:05:18
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.9, S.1939-1943
  2. Bornmann, L.; Moya Anegón, F. de; Mutz, R.: Do universities or research institutions with a specific subject profile have an advantage or a disadvantage in institutional rankings? (2013) 0.00
    5.936372E-4 = product of:
      0.0011872743 = sum of:
        0.0011872743 = product of:
          0.003561823 = sum of:
            0.003561823 = weight(_text_:s in 1109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.003561823 = score(doc=1109,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1109, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1109)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.11, S.2310-2316
  3. Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.; Daniel, H.D.: Do we need the h index and its variants in addition to standard bibliometric measures? (2009) 0.00
    4.9469766E-4 = product of:
      9.893953E-4 = sum of:
        9.893953E-4 = product of:
          0.0029681858 = sum of:
            0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029681858 = score(doc=2861,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.6, S.1286-1289
  4. Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: Growth rates of modern science : a bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015) 0.00
    4.9469766E-4 = product of:
      9.893953E-4 = sum of:
        9.893953E-4 = product of:
          0.0029681858 = sum of:
            0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 2261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029681858 = score(doc=2261,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2261, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2261)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.11, S.2215-2222