Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
- Did you mean:
- author's%3a%22Boyett%2c S.%22 2
- authors%3a%22Boyett%2c S.%22 2
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.; Daniel, H.-D.: Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? : a comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine (2008)
0.00
7.520119E-4 = product of: 0.0015040238 = sum of: 0.0015040238 = product of: 0.0030080476 = sum of: 0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 1608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.0030080476 = score(doc=1608,freq=2.0), product of: 0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of: 1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218) 0.046063907 = queryNorm 0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1608, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218) 0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1608) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.5, S.830-837
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.; Daniel, H.D.: Do we need the h index and its variants in addition to standard bibliometric measures? (2009)
0.00
7.520119E-4 = product of: 0.0015040238 = sum of: 0.0015040238 = product of: 0.0030080476 = sum of: 0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.0030080476 = score(doc=2861,freq=2.0), product of: 0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of: 1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218) 0.046063907 = queryNorm 0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218) 0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.6, S.1286-1289