Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

Egghe, L.; Bornmann, L.: Fallout and miss in journal peer review (2013) 0.01
```
0.005460869 = product of:
  0.038226083 = sum of:
    0.038226083 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038226083 = score(doc=1759,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03819578 = queryNorm
        0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 1759, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1759)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
```
Abstract

Purpose - The authors exploit the analogy between journal peer review and information retrieval in order to quantify some imperfections of journal peer review. Design/methodology/approach - The authors define fallout rate and missing rate in order to describe quantitatively the weak papers that were accepted and the strong papers that were missed, respectively. To assess the quality of manuscripts the authors use bibliometric measures. Findings - Fallout rate and missing rate are put in relation with the hitting rate and success rate. Conclusions are drawn on what fraction of weak papers will be accepted in order to have a certain fraction of strong accepted papers. Originality/value - The paper illustrates that these curves are new in peer review research when interpreted in the information retrieval terminology.
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: ¬The operationalization of "fields" as WoS subject categories (WCs) in evaluative bibliometrics : the cases of "library and information science" and "science & technology studies" (2016) 0.00
```
0.0033097868 = product of:
  0.023168506 = sum of:
    0.023168506 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023168506 = score(doc=2779,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03819578 = queryNorm
        0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2779, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2779)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
```
Abstract

Normalization of citation scores using reference sets based on Web of Science subject categories (WCs) has become an established ("best") practice in evaluative bibliometrics. For example, the Times Higher Education World University Rankings are, among other things, based on this operationalization. However, WCs were developed decades ago for the purpose of information retrieval and evolved incrementally with the database; the classification is machine-based and partially manually corrected. Using the WC "information science & library science" and the WCs attributed to journals in the field of "science and technology studies," we show that WCs do not provide sufficient analytical clarity to carry bibliometric normalization in evaluation practices because of "indexer effects." Can the compliance with "best practices" be replaced with an ambition to develop "best possible practices"? New research questions can then be envisaged.

Bornmann, L.: On the function of university rankings (2014) 0.00

0.0029839869 = product of:
  0.020887908 = sum of:
    0.020887908 = product of:
      0.06266372 = sum of:
        0.06266372 = weight(_text_:29 in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06266372 = score(doc=1188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13436082 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03819578 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date: 29. 1.2014 16:55:03

Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014) 0.00

0.0029571436 = product of:
  0.020700004 = sum of:
    0.020700004 = product of:
      0.06210001 = sum of:
        0.06210001 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06210001 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13375512 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03819578 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date: 18. 3.2014 19:13:22

Bauer, J.; Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: Highly cited papers in Library and Information Science (LIS) : authors, institutions, and network structures (2016) 0.00
```
0.0026272153 = product of:
  0.018390507 = sum of:
    0.018390507 = weight(_text_:internet in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018390507 = score(doc=3231,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11276311 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03819578 = queryNorm
        0.16308975 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
```
Abstract

As a follow-up to the highly cited authors list published by Thomson Reuters in June 2014, we analyzed the top 1% most frequently cited papers published between 2002 and 2012 included in the Web of Science (WoS) subject category "Information Science & Library Science." In all, 798 authors contributed to 305 top 1% publications; these authors were employed at 275 institutions. The authors at Harvard University contributed the largest number of papers, when the addresses are whole-number counted. However, Leiden University leads the ranking if fractional counting is used. Twenty-three of the 798 authors were also listed as most highly cited authors by Thomson Reuters in June 2014 (http://highlycited.com/). Twelve of these 23 authors were involved in publishing 4 or more of the 305 papers under study. Analysis of coauthorship relations among the 798 highly cited scientists shows that coauthorships are based on common interests in a specific topic. Three topics were important between 2002 and 2012: (a) collection and exploitation of information in clinical practices; (b) use of the Internet in public communication and commerce; and (c) scientometrics.

Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014) 0.00

0.001971429 = product of:
  0.013800003 = sum of:
    0.013800003 = product of:
      0.041400008 = sum of:
        0.041400008 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041400008 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13375512 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03819578 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date: 22. 8.2014 17:05:18

Bornmann, L.; Marx, W.: Distributions instead of single numbers : percentiles and beam plots for the assessment of single researchers (2014) 0.00

0.0017406589 = product of:
  0.0121846115 = sum of:
    0.0121846115 = product of:
      0.036553834 = sum of:
        0.036553834 = weight(_text_:29 in 1190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036553834 = score(doc=1190,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13436082 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03819578 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1190, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1190)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date: 29. 1.2014 15:58:21

Bornmann, L.: How to analyze percentile citation impact data meaningfully in bibliometrics : the statistical analysis of distributions, percentile rank classes, and top-cited papers (2013) 0.00

0.0014785718 = product of:
  0.010350002 = sum of:
    0.010350002 = product of:
      0.031050006 = sum of:
        0.031050006 = weight(_text_:22 in 656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031050006 = score(doc=656,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13375512 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03819578 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 656, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=656)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date: 22. 3.2013 19:44:17

Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.S.: ¬The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact (2019) 0.00

0.0014785718 = product of:
  0.010350002 = sum of:
    0.010350002 = product of:
      0.031050006 = sum of:
        0.031050006 = weight(_text_:22 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031050006 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13375512 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03819578 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date: 8. 1.2019 18:22:45

Bornmann, L.; Schier, H.; Marx, W.; Daniel, H.-D.: Is interactive open access publishing able to identify high-impact submissions? : a study on the predictive validity of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics by using percentile rank classes (2011) 0.00

0.0012433277 = product of:
  0.008703294 = sum of:
    0.008703294 = product of:
      0.026109882 = sum of:
        0.026109882 = weight(_text_:29 in 4132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026109882 = score(doc=4132,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13436082 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03819578 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4132, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4132)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date: 8. 1.2011 18:29:40

Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor : normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science (2011) 0.00

0.0012321433 = product of:
  0.008625003 = sum of:
    0.008625003 = product of:
      0.025875006 = sum of:
        0.025875006 = weight(_text_:22 in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025875006 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13375512 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03819578 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date: 22. 1.2011 12:51:07

Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Themes