-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014)
0.03
0.027266314 = product of:
0.05453263 = sum of:
0.05453263 = product of:
0.08179894 = sum of:
0.0071918257 = weight(_text_:s in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0071918257 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.07460712 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07460712 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16069375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 18. 3.2014 19:13:22
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.4, S.866-867
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.S.: ¬The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact (2019)
0.03
0.025939818 = product of:
0.051879637 = sum of:
0.051879637 = sum of:
0.010980166 = weight(_text_:d in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010980166 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.0035959128 = weight(_text_:s in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0035959128 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.03730356 = weight(_text_:22 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03730356 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16069375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A recent publication in Nature reports that public R&D funding is only weakly correlated with the citation impact of a nation's articles as measured by the field-weighted citation index (FWCI; defined by Scopus). On the basis of the supplementary data, we up-scaled the design using Web of Science data for the decade 2003-2013 and OECD funding data for the corresponding decade assuming a 2-year delay (2001-2011). Using negative binomial regression analysis, we found very small coefficients, but the effects of international collaboration are positive and statistically significant, whereas the effects of government funding are negative, an order of magnitude smaller, and statistically nonsignificant (in two of three analyses). In other words, international collaboration improves the impact of research articles, whereas more government funding tends to have a small adverse effect when comparing OECD countries.
- Date
- 8. 1.2019 18:22:45
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 70(2019) no.2, S.198-201
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014)
0.02
0.018177543 = product of:
0.036355086 = sum of:
0.036355086 = product of:
0.05453263 = sum of:
0.0047945506 = weight(_text_:s in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0047945506 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.04973808 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04973808 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16069375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:05:18
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.9, S.1939-1943
-
Bornmann, L.: How to analyze percentile citation impact data meaningfully in bibliometrics : the statistical analysis of distributions, percentile rank classes, and top-cited papers (2013)
0.01
0.013633157 = product of:
0.027266314 = sum of:
0.027266314 = product of:
0.04089947 = sum of:
0.0035959128 = weight(_text_:s in 656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0035959128 = score(doc=656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=656)
0.03730356 = weight(_text_:22 in 656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03730356 = score(doc=656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16069375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=656)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:44:17
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.3, S.587-595
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor : normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science (2011)
0.01
0.011360965 = product of:
0.02272193 = sum of:
0.02272193 = product of:
0.034082893 = sum of:
0.0029965942 = weight(_text_:s in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0029965942 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
0.0310863 = weight(_text_:22 in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0310863 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16069375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 12:51:07
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.217-229
-
Bornmann, L.: Lässt sich die Qualität von Forschung messen? (2013)
0.01
0.006374738 = product of:
0.012749476 = sum of:
0.012749476 = product of:
0.019124214 = sum of:
0.015528301 = weight(_text_:d in 928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015528301 = score(doc=928,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.178113 = fieldWeight in 928, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=928)
0.0035959128 = weight(_text_:s in 928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0035959128 = score(doc=928,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 928, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=928)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Grundsätzlich können wir bei Bewertungen in der Wissenschaft zwischen einer 'qualitative' Form, der Bewertung einer wissenschaftlichen Arbeit (z. B. eines Manuskripts oder Forschungsantrags) durch kompetente Peers, und einer 'quantitative' Form, der Bewertung von wissenschaftlicher Arbeit anhand bibliometrischer Indikatoren unterscheiden. Beide Formen der Bewertung sind nicht unumstritten. Die Kritiker des Peer Review sehen vor allem zwei Schwächen des Verfahrens: (1) Verschiedene Gutachter würden kaum in der Bewertung ein und derselben wissenschaftlichen Arbeit übereinstimmen. (2) Gutachterliche Empfehlungen würden systematische Urteilsverzerrungen aufweisen. Gegen die Verwendung von Zitierhäufigkeiten als Indikator für die Qualität einer wissenschaftlichen Arbeit wird seit Jahren eine Vielzahl von Bedenken geäußert. Zitierhäufigkeiten seien keine 'objektiven' Messungen von wissenschaftlicher Qualität, sondern ein kritisierbares Messkonstrukt. So wird unter anderem kritisiert, dass wissenschaftliche Qualität ein komplexes Phänomen darstelle, das nicht auf einer eindimensionalen Skala (d. h. anhand von Zitierhäufigkeiten) gemessen werden könne. Es werden empirische Ergebnisse zur Reliabilität und Fairness des Peer Review Verfahrens sowie Forschungsergebnisse zur Güte von Zitierhäufigkeiten als Indikator für wissenschaftliche Qualität vorgestellt.
- Language
- d
- Pages
- S.350-356
-
Bornmann, L.; Schier, H.; Marx, W.; Daniel, H.-D.: Is interactive open access publishing able to identify high-impact submissions? : a study on the predictive validity of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics by using percentile rank classes (2011)
0.00
0.004048911 = product of:
0.008097822 = sum of:
0.008097822 = product of:
0.012146732 = sum of:
0.009150138 = weight(_text_:d in 4132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009150138 = score(doc=4132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 4132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4132)
0.0029965942 = weight(_text_:s in 4132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0029965942 = score(doc=4132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4132)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.1, S.61-71
-
Bornmann, L.: Nature's top 100 revisited (2015)
0.00
0.0014126081 = product of:
0.0028252162 = sum of:
0.0028252162 = product of:
0.008475648 = sum of:
0.008475648 = weight(_text_:s in 2351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008475648 = score(doc=2351,freq=4.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.16988087 = fieldWeight in 2351, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2351)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Bezug: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.12, S.2714. Vgl.: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.23554/abstract.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.10, S.2166
-
Bornmann, L.: On the function of university rankings (2014)
0.00
0.0011986376 = product of:
0.0023972753 = sum of:
0.0023972753 = product of:
0.0071918257 = sum of:
0.0071918257 = weight(_text_:s in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0071918257 = score(doc=1188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.2, S.428-429
-
Bornmann, L.: Is there currently a scientific revolution in Scientometrics? (2014)
0.00
0.0011986376 = product of:
0.0023972753 = sum of:
0.0023972753 = product of:
0.0071918257 = sum of:
0.0071918257 = weight(_text_:s in 1206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0071918257 = score(doc=1206,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 1206, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1206)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.3, S.647-648
-
Bornmann, L.; Bauer, J.; Haunschild, R.: Distribution of women and men among highly cited scientists (2015)
0.00
0.0011986376 = product of:
0.0023972753 = sum of:
0.0023972753 = product of:
0.0071918257 = sum of:
0.0071918257 = weight(_text_:s in 2349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0071918257 = score(doc=2349,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 2349, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2349)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.12, S.2715-2716
-
Bornmann, L.: What do altmetrics counts mean? : a plea for content analyses (2016)
0.00
0.0011986376 = product of:
0.0023972753 = sum of:
0.0023972753 = product of:
0.0071918257 = sum of:
0.0071918257 = weight(_text_:s in 2858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0071918257 = score(doc=2858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 2858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2858)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.4, S.1016-1017
-
Bornmann, L.; Bauer, J.: Which of the world's institutions employ the most highly cited researchers : an analysis of the data from highlycited.com (2015)
0.00
7.9909177E-4 = product of:
0.0015981835 = sum of:
0.0015981835 = product of:
0.0047945506 = sum of:
0.0047945506 = weight(_text_:s in 1556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0047945506 = score(doc=1556,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1556, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1556)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.10, S.2146-2148
-
Bornmann, L.; Bauer, J.: Which of the world's institutions employ the most highly cited researchers : an analysis of the data from highlycited.com (2015)
0.00
7.9909177E-4 = product of:
0.0015981835 = sum of:
0.0015981835 = product of:
0.0047945506 = sum of:
0.0047945506 = weight(_text_:s in 2223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0047945506 = score(doc=2223,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2223, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2223)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.10, S.2146-2148
-
Bornmann, L.; Marx, W.: Distributions instead of single numbers : percentiles and beam plots for the assessment of single researchers (2014)
0.00
6.992053E-4 = product of:
0.0013984106 = sum of:
0.0013984106 = product of:
0.004195232 = sum of:
0.004195232 = weight(_text_:s in 1190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004195232 = score(doc=1190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1190)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.1, S.206-208
-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.; Barth, A.; Leydesdorff, L.: Detecting the historical roots of research fields by reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS) (2014)
0.00
6.992053E-4 = product of:
0.0013984106 = sum of:
0.0013984106 = product of:
0.004195232 = sum of:
0.004195232 = weight(_text_:s in 1238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004195232 = score(doc=1238,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1238, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1238)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.4, S.751-764
-
Bornmann, L.; Marx, W.: ¬The wisdom of citing scientists (2014)
0.00
6.992053E-4 = product of:
0.0013984106 = sum of:
0.0013984106 = product of:
0.004195232 = sum of:
0.004195232 = weight(_text_:s in 1293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004195232 = score(doc=1293,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1293, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1293)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.6, S.1288-1292
-
Bornmann, L.: How well does a university perform in comparison with its peers? : The use of odds, and odds ratios, for the comparison of institutional citation impact using the Leiden Rankings (2015)
0.00
6.992053E-4 = product of:
0.0013984106 = sum of:
0.0013984106 = product of:
0.004195232 = sum of:
0.004195232 = weight(_text_:s in 2340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004195232 = score(doc=2340,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 2340, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2340)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.12, S.2711-2713
-
Bornmann, L.; Haunschild, R.: Relative Citation Ratio (RCR) : an empirical attempt to study a new field-normalized bibliometric indicator (2017)
0.00
6.992053E-4 = product of:
0.0013984106 = sum of:
0.0013984106 = product of:
0.004195232 = sum of:
0.004195232 = weight(_text_:s in 3541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004195232 = score(doc=3541,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3541, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3541)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.4, S.1064-1067
-
Bornmann, L.; Leydesdorff, L.: Which cities produce more excellent papers than can be expected? : a new mapping approach, using Google Maps, based on statistical significance testing (2011)
0.00
5.993188E-4 = product of:
0.0011986376 = sum of:
0.0011986376 = product of:
0.0035959128 = sum of:
0.0035959128 = weight(_text_:s in 4767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0035959128 = score(doc=4767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 4767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4767)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.10, S.1954-1962
