-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.S.: ¬The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact (2019)
0.24
0.23775086 = sum of:
0.024231484 = product of:
0.07269445 = sum of:
0.07269445 = weight(_text_:2001 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07269445 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25574988 = queryWeight, product of:
4.2877507 = idf(docFreq=1650, maxDocs=44218)
0.059646633 = queryNorm
0.2842404 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.2877507 = idf(docFreq=1650, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.21351938 = sum of:
0.16503161 = weight(_text_:201 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16503161 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38534382 = queryWeight, product of:
6.4604454 = idf(docFreq=187, maxDocs=44218)
0.059646633 = queryNorm
0.42827109 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.4604454 = idf(docFreq=187, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.04848777 = weight(_text_:22 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04848777 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20887235 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059646633 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
- Abstract
- A recent publication in Nature reports that public R&D funding is only weakly correlated with the citation impact of a nation's articles as measured by the field-weighted citation index (FWCI; defined by Scopus). On the basis of the supplementary data, we up-scaled the design using Web of Science data for the decade 2003-2013 and OECD funding data for the corresponding decade assuming a 2-year delay (2001-2011). Using negative binomial regression analysis, we found very small coefficients, but the effects of international collaboration are positive and statistically significant, whereas the effects of government funding are negative, an order of magnitude smaller, and statistically nonsignificant (in two of three analyses). In other words, international collaboration improves the impact of research articles, whereas more government funding tends to have a small adverse effect when comparing OECD countries.
- Date
- 8. 1.2019 18:22:45
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 70(2019) no.2, S.198-201
-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014)
0.02
0.024243886 = product of:
0.04848777 = sum of:
0.04848777 = product of:
0.09697554 = sum of:
0.09697554 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09697554 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20887235 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059646633 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 18. 3.2014 19:13:22
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014)
0.02
0.016162591 = product of:
0.032325182 = sum of:
0.032325182 = product of:
0.064650364 = sum of:
0.064650364 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064650364 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20887235 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059646633 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:05:18
-
Bornmann, L.: How to analyze percentile citation impact data meaningfully in bibliometrics : the statistical analysis of distributions, percentile rank classes, and top-cited papers (2013)
0.01
0.012121943 = product of:
0.024243886 = sum of:
0.024243886 = product of:
0.04848777 = sum of:
0.04848777 = weight(_text_:22 in 656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04848777 = score(doc=656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20887235 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059646633 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=656)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:44:17
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor : normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science (2011)
0.01
0.010101619 = product of:
0.020203238 = sum of:
0.020203238 = product of:
0.040406477 = sum of:
0.040406477 = weight(_text_:22 in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040406477 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20887235 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059646633 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 12:51:07
-
Bornmann, L.; Marx, W.: ¬The Anna Karenina principle : a way of thinking about success in science (2012)
0.01
0.010096451 = product of:
0.020192903 = sum of:
0.020192903 = product of:
0.060578708 = sum of:
0.060578708 = weight(_text_:2001 in 449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060578708 = score(doc=449,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25574988 = queryWeight, product of:
4.2877507 = idf(docFreq=1650, maxDocs=44218)
0.059646633 = queryNorm
0.236867 = fieldWeight in 449, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.2877507 = idf(docFreq=1650, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=449)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The first sentence of Leo Tolstoy's (1875-1877/2001) novel Anna Karenina is: "Happy families are all alike; every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way." Here, Tolstoy means that for a family to be happy, several key aspects must be given (e.g., good health of all family members, acceptable financial security, and mutual affection). If there is a deficiency in any one or more of these key aspects, the family will be unhappy. In this article, we introduce the Anna Karenina principle as a way of thinking about success in science in three central areas in (modern) science: (a) peer review of research grant proposals and manuscripts (money and journal space as scarce resources), (b) citation of publications (reception as a scarce resource), and (c) new scientific discoveries (recognition as a scarce resource). If resources are scarce at the highly competitive research front (journal space, funds, reception, and recognition), there can be success only when several key prerequisites for the allocation of the resources are fulfilled. If any one of these prerequisites is not fulfilled, the grant proposal, manuscript submission, the published paper, or the discovery will not be successful.
