Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Bourne, R."
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Bourne, R.: Bridging the gap : technological differences in the production of current national bibliographies (1994) 0.04
    0.043220416 = product of:
      0.08644083 = sum of:
        0.030628446 = weight(_text_:library in 7889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030628446 = score(doc=7889,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 7889, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7889)
        0.055812385 = product of:
          0.11162477 = sum of:
            0.11162477 = weight(_text_:project in 7889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11162477 = score(doc=7889,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.52762264 = fieldWeight in 7889, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7889)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the activities of the IFLA Section on Bibliography in the improvement of bibliographic control and, especially, the encouragement of national bibliographies. Outlines a project to identify those aspects of producing a current national bibliography that distinguishes advanced countries from those that are economically disadvantaged. Presents observations regarding technology and national bibliographies and invites comments upon them to serve as input to the project. Deals with: format; coverage; currency; quality; national networks; infrastructure; education; scholarship and the national library community; and information technology
  2. Bourne, R.: MARC harmonization : progress and problems (1997) 0.03
    0.028895756 = product of:
      0.057791512 = sum of:
        0.030628446 = weight(_text_:library in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030628446 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
        0.027163066 = product of:
          0.054326132 = sum of:
            0.054326132 = weight(_text_:22 in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054326132 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The British Library have conformed their decision to go ahead with the harmonization programme between the US and UKMARC formats, and although the final date for the changeover is still not yet, they expect the whole process to be over in 2 years, with one further year after that when they will support UKMARC. Describes the progress made so far, and problems that remain to be solved
    Source
    LASER link. 1997, Spring/Summer, S.22-24
  3. Bourne, R.: ¬The European BIBLINK Project (1999) 0.01
    0.014799493 = product of:
      0.059197973 = sum of:
        0.059197973 = product of:
          0.11839595 = sum of:
            0.11839595 = weight(_text_:project in 2804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11839595 = score(doc=2804,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.5596283 = fieldWeight in 2804, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2804)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  4. Bourne, R.: Standards: who needs them? (1994) 0.01
    0.013399946 = product of:
      0.053599782 = sum of:
        0.053599782 = weight(_text_:library in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053599782 = score(doc=562,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the role of the British Standards Institution (BSI) in formulating bibliographic standards. Outline how library stanbdards have developed and why librarians need to standardize. The democratic aspect of BSI's work has been adversely affected by its 1990 decision to move its IT related activities to a new body; Delivery Information Solutions to Customers through International Standars (Disc), which operates on the basis of standards being formulated only by those prepared to pay a separate subscription. Questions whether BSI is the most appropriate body to serve the interest of the library and information services community. Proposes an alternative standards umbrella that would be better informed and more representative on LIS matters, and canvasses opinion as th whether the UK Library Association could handle standards work on behalf of BSI
    Source
    Library Association record. 96(1994) no.3, S.148-149
  5. Bourne, R.: Common MARC, or vivent les differences? (1996) 0.01
    0.00957139 = product of:
      0.03828556 = sum of:
        0.03828556 = weight(_text_:library in 4690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03828556 = score(doc=4690,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.29050803 = fieldWeight in 4690, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4690)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Library review. 45(1996) no.2, S.25-29