Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Boyack, K.W."
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Boyack, K.W.; Small, H.; Klavans, R.: Improving the accuracy of co-citation clustering using full text (2013) 0.01
    0.009505202 = product of:
      0.019010404 = sum of:
        0.019010404 = product of:
          0.03802081 = sum of:
            0.03802081 = weight(_text_:r in 1036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03802081 = score(doc=1036,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 1036, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1036)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  2. Boyack, K.W.; Klavans, R.: Creation of a highly detailed, dynamic, global model and map of science (2014) 0.01
    0.009505202 = product of:
      0.019010404 = sum of:
        0.019010404 = product of:
          0.03802081 = sum of:
            0.03802081 = weight(_text_:r in 1230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03802081 = score(doc=1230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 1230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1230)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Colavizza, G.; Boyack, K.W.; Eck, N.J. van; Waltman, L.: ¬The closer the better : similarity of publication pairs at different cocitation levels (2018) 0.01
    0.009013871 = product of:
      0.018027741 = sum of:
        0.018027741 = product of:
          0.072110966 = sum of:
            0.072110966 = weight(_text_:authors in 4214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.072110966 = score(doc=4214,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23861247 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 4214, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4214)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    We investigated the similarities of pairs of articles that are cocited at the different cocitation levels of the journal, article, section, paragraph, sentence, and bracket. Our results indicate that textual similarity, intellectual overlap (shared references), author overlap (shared authors), proximity in publication time all rise monotonically as the cocitation level gets lower (from journal to bracket). While the main gain in similarity happens when moving from journal to article cocitation, all level changes entail an increase in similarity, especially section to paragraph and paragraph to sentence/bracket levels. We compared the results from four journals over the years 2010-2015: Cell, the European Journal of Operational Research, Physics Letters B, and Research Policy, with consistent general outcomes and some interesting differences. Our findings motivate the use of granular cocitation information as defined by meaningful units of text, with implications for, among others, the elaboration of maps of science and the retrieval of scholarly literature.
  4. Boyack, K.W.; Klavans, R.: Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation : which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? (2010) 0.01
    0.007921002 = product of:
      0.015842004 = sum of:
        0.015842004 = product of:
          0.031684007 = sum of:
            0.031684007 = weight(_text_:r in 4111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031684007 = score(doc=4111,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 4111, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4111)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Klavans, R.; Boyack, K.W.: Using global mapping to create more accurate document-level maps of research fields (2011) 0.01
    0.007921002 = product of:
      0.015842004 = sum of:
        0.015842004 = product of:
          0.031684007 = sum of:
            0.031684007 = weight(_text_:r in 4956) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031684007 = score(doc=4956,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 4956, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4956)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)