Brooks, T.A.: How good are the best papers of JASIS? (2000)
0.01
0.005880873 = product of:
0.023523493 = sum of:
0.023523493 = weight(_text_:information in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023523493 = score(doc=4593,freq=8.0), product of:
0.10106951 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.057573788 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- A citation analysis examined the 28 best articles published in JASIS from 1969-1996. Best articles tend to single-authored works twice as long as the avergae article published in JASIS. They are cited and self-cited much more often than the average article. The greatest source of references made to the best articles is from JASIS itself. The top 5 best papers focus largely on information retrieval and online searching
- Content
- Top by numbers of citations: (1) Saracevic, T. et al.: A study of information seeking and retrieving I-III (1988); (2) Bates, M.: Information search tactics (1979); (3) Cooper, W.S.: On selecting a measure of retrieval effectiveness (1973); (4) Marcus, R.S.: A experimental comparison of the effectiveness of computers and humans as search intermediaries (1983); (4) Fidel, R.: Online searching styles (1984)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.5, S.485-486