Brooks, T.A.: How good are the best papers of JASIS? (2000)
0.00
0.0022360564 = product of:
0.015652394 = sum of:
0.015652394 = product of:
0.031304788 = sum of:
0.031304788 = weight(_text_:online in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031304788 = score(doc=4593,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11002589 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.03625353 = queryNorm
0.284522 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- A citation analysis examined the 28 best articles published in JASIS from 1969-1996. Best articles tend to single-authored works twice as long as the avergae article published in JASIS. They are cited and self-cited much more often than the average article. The greatest source of references made to the best articles is from JASIS itself. The top 5 best papers focus largely on information retrieval and online searching
- Content
- Top by numbers of citations: (1) Saracevic, T. et al.: A study of information seeking and retrieving I-III (1988); (2) Bates, M.: Information search tactics (1979); (3) Cooper, W.S.: On selecting a measure of retrieval effectiveness (1973); (4) Marcus, R.S.: A experimental comparison of the effectiveness of computers and humans as search intermediaries (1983); (4) Fidel, R.: Online searching styles (1984)