-
Mills, J.; Broughton, V.: Bliss Bibliographic Classification : Introduction and auxiliary schedules (1992)
0.03
0.025891943 = product of:
0.12945971 = sum of:
0.12945971 = product of:
0.3883791 = sum of:
0.3883791 = weight(_text_:bliss in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.3883791 = score(doc=821,freq=14.0), product of:
0.23216012 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03245364 = queryNorm
1.6728933 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- LCSH
- Bliss Bibliographic classification
- PRECIS
- Documents / Subject classification schemes: Bliss, Henry Evelyn / Bliss bibliographic classification / Texts
- Subject
- Bliss Bibliographic classification
Documents / Subject classification schemes: Bliss, Henry Evelyn / Bliss bibliographic classification / Texts
-
Broughton, V.: Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment : the Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multi-dimensional knowledge structures (2001)
0.01
0.008649891 = product of:
0.043249454 = sum of:
0.043249454 = product of:
0.12974836 = sum of:
0.12974836 = weight(_text_:bliss in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12974836 = score(doc=5895,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23216012 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03245364 = queryNorm
0.5588744 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Broughton is one of the key people working on the second edition of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification (BC2). Her article has a brief, informative history of facets, then discusses semantic vs. syntactic relationships, standard facets used by Ranganathan and the Classification Research Group, facet analysis and citation order, and how to build subject indexes out of faceted classifications, all with occasional reference to digital environments and hypertext, but never with any specifics. It concludes by saying of faceted classification that the "capacity which it has to create highly sophisticated structures for the accommodation of complex objects suggests that it is worth investigation as an organizational tool for digital materials, and that the results of such investigation would be knowledge structures of unparalleled utility and elegance." How to build them is left to the reader, but this article provides an excellent starting point. It includes an example that shows how general concepts can be applied to a small set of documents and subjects, and how terms can be adapted to suit the material and users
-
Broughton, V.: Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment : the Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multidimensional knowledge structures (2003)
0.01
0.007339676 = product of:
0.03669838 = sum of:
0.03669838 = product of:
0.110095136 = sum of:
0.110095136 = weight(_text_:bliss in 2631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.110095136 = score(doc=2631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23216012 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.03245364 = queryNorm
0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 2631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2631)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
