Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

Mills, J.; Broughton, V.: Bliss Bibliographic Classification : Introduction and auxiliary schedules (1992) 0.03

0.025891943 = product of:
  0.12945971 = sum of:
    0.12945971 = product of:
      0.3883791 = sum of:
        0.3883791 = weight(_text_:bliss in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3883791 = score(doc=821,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.23216012 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03245364 = queryNorm
            1.6728933 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

LCSH: Bliss Bibliographic classification
PRECIS: Documents / Subject classification schemes: Bliss, Henry Evelyn / Bliss bibliographic classification / Texts
Subject: Bliss Bibliographic classification
Documents / Subject classification schemes: Bliss, Henry Evelyn / Bliss bibliographic classification / Texts

Broughton, V.: Notational expressivity : the case for and against the representation of internal subject structure in notational coding (1999) 0.02

0.018196968 = product of:
  0.045492418 = sum of:
    0.03669838 = product of:
      0.110095136 = sum of:
        0.110095136 = weight(_text_:bliss in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.110095136 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23216012 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03245364 = queryNorm
            0.4742207 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.008794041 = product of:
      0.026382122 = sum of:
        0.026382122 = weight(_text_:22 in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026382122 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113647126 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03245364 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract: The ways in which notation can be used to express the content of documents to which it relates are various. At the most superficial level notation can correspond to the hierarchical structure of the schedules or link to literal components. The notation of compound concepts can express the structure and composition of the compound, and systems exist in which symbols denote the functional roles of the constituent elements and the relationships between them. At the highest level notation can be used to mirror the actual structure of those entities which it represents, as in the case of mathematical systems or chemical compounds. Methods of displaying these structures are examined, and the practicality in a documentary context is questioned, with particular reference to recent revision work on the chemistry class of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification 2nd edition (BC2)
Date: 10. 8.2001 13:22:14

Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

Types

Themes

Subjects