Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

Did you mean:
editor's%3a%22Coopmans%2c C. et al.%22 5
editore%3a%22Coopmans%2c C. et al.%22 5
editores%3a%22Coopmans%2c C. et al.%22 5
editor%3a%22Coopmans%2c C. et al.%22 5
editions%3a%22Coopmans%2c C. et al.%22 5

Brown, C.: ¬The role of electronic preprints in chemical communication : analysis of citation, usage, and acceptance in the journal literature (2003) 0.04
```
0.041685432 = product of:
  0.083370864 = sum of:
    0.051792707 = product of:
      0.20717083 = sum of:
        0.20717083 = weight(_text_:editors in 1453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20717083 = score(doc=1453,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.3225211 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048042245 = queryNorm
            0.6423482 = fieldWeight in 1453, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1453)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    0.031578153 = weight(_text_:c in 1453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031578153 = score(doc=1453,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16571717 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048042245 = queryNorm
        0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 1453, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1453)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
```
Abstract

This study characterizes the usage and acceptance of electronic preprints (e-prints) in the literature of chemistry. Survey of authors of e-prints appearing in the Chemistry Preprint Server (CPS) at http://preprints. chemweb.com indicates use of the CPS as a convenient vehicle for dissemination of research findings and for receipt of feedback before submitting to a peer-reviewed journal. Reception of CPS e-prints by editors of top chemistry journals is very poor. Only 6% of editors responding allow publication of articles that have previously appeared as e-prints. Concerns focus an the lack of peer review and the uncertain permanence of e-print storage. Consequently, it was not surprising to discover that citation analysis yielded no citations to CPS e-prints in the traditional literature of chemistry. Yet data collected and posted by the CPS indicates that the e-prints are valued, read, and discussed to a notable extent within the chemistry community. Thirty-two percent of the most highly rated, viewed, and discussed e-prints eventually appear in the journal literature, indicating the validity of the work submitted to the CPS. This investigation illustrates the ambivalence with which editors and authors view the CPS, but also gives an early sense of the potential free and rapid information dissemination, coupled with open, uninhibited discussion and evaluation, has to expand, enrich, and vitalize the scholarly discourse of chemical scientists.
Brown, C.: ¬The evolution of preprints in the scholarly communication of physicists and astronomers (2001) 0.03
```
0.030740343 = product of:
  0.061480686 = sum of:
    0.02990253 = product of:
      0.11961012 = sum of:
        0.11961012 = weight(_text_:editors in 5184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11961012 = score(doc=5184,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3225211 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048042245 = queryNorm
            0.37085986 = fieldWeight in 5184, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5184)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    0.031578153 = weight(_text_:c in 5184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031578153 = score(doc=5184,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16571717 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048042245 = queryNorm
        0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 5184, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5184)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
```
Abstract

In one of two bibliometric papers in this issue Brown looks at formal publication and citation of Eprints as shown by the policies and practices of 37 top tier physics journals, and by citation trends in ISI's SciSearch database and Journal Citation Reports. Citation analysis was carried out if Eprint cites were indicated by editor response, instruction to authors sections, reports in the literature, or actual examination of citation lists. Total contribution to 12 archives and their citation counts in the journals were compiled. Of the 13 editors surveyed that responded, 8 published papers that had appeared in the archive. Two of these required removal from the archive at publication; two of the 13 did not publish papers that have appeared as Eprints. A review journal that solicits its contributions allowed citation of Eprints. Seven allowed citations to Eprints, but were less than enthusiastic.Nearly 36,000 citations were made to the 12 archives. Citations to the 37 journals and their impact factors remain constant over the period of 1991 to 1998. Eprint citations appear to peak about 3 years after appearance as do citations to published papers. Contribution to the archives, and their use as measured by citation, is clearly growing. Citation form and publishing policy varies from journal to journal.

Brown, C.: Physical sciences and mathematics literatures and their users (2009) 0.01

0.009473446 = product of:
  0.037893783 = sum of:
    0.037893783 = weight(_text_:c in 3864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037893783 = score(doc=3864,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16571717 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048042245 = queryNorm
        0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 3864, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3864)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Brown, C.: ¬The changing face of scientific discourse : analysis of genomic and proteomic database usage and acceptance (2003) 0.01

0.007894538 = product of:
  0.031578153 = sum of:
    0.031578153 = weight(_text_:c in 1752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031578153 = score(doc=1752,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16571717 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048042245 = queryNorm
        0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 1752, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1752)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Brown, C.: ¬The role of Web-based information in the scholarly communication of chemists : citation and content analyses of American Chemical Society Journals (2007) 0.01

0.007894538 = product of:
  0.031578153 = sum of:
    0.031578153 = weight(_text_:c in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031578153 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16571717 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048042245 = queryNorm
        0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

Themes