Brugger, J.M.: Cataloging for digital libraries (1996)
0.20
0.1960262 = product of:
0.26136827 = sum of:
0.097483054 = weight(_text_:digital in 6732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.097483054 = score(doc=6732,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.493069 = fieldWeight in 6732, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6732)
0.030628446 = weight(_text_:library in 6732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030628446 = score(doc=6732,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 6732, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6732)
0.13325676 = sum of:
0.07893063 = weight(_text_:project in 6732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07893063 = score(doc=6732,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.37308553 = fieldWeight in 6732, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6732)
0.054326132 = weight(_text_:22 in 6732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054326132 = score(doc=6732,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6732, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6732)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- Considers the problem of applying standard concepts of cataloguing and bibliographic control to electronic media by studying the degree of fit between the Standford Integrated Digital Library Project (SDLP) and both the USMARC format and the Text Encoding Initiative (TEI). Notes the lack of fit of both USMARC and TEI but stresses the advantages of the latter due its lack of dependency on 3 digit tags and its use of SGML conventions
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
