Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Buckland, M."
  • × author_ss:"Gey, F."
  1. Buckland, M.; Gey, F.: ¬The relationship between recall and precision (1994) 0.00 
    0.0025028288 = product of:
  0.0075084865 = sum of:
    0.0075084865 = weight(_text_:a in 7204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0075084865 = score(doc=7204,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 7204, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7204)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Empirical studies of retrieval performance have shown a tendency for Precision to decline as Recall increases. Examines the nature of the relationship between recall and the number of documents retrieved, between precision and the number of documents retrieved, and precision and recall are described in the context of different assumptions about retrieval performance
    Type
    a
  2. Buckland, M.; Chen, A.; Chen, H.M.; Kim, Y.; Lam, B.; Larson, R.; Norgard, B.; Purat, J.; Gey, F.: Mapping entry vocabulary to unfamiliar metadata vocabularies (1999) 0.00 
    0.0022989952 = product of:
  0.006896985 = sum of:
    0.006896985 = weight(_text_:a in 1238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006896985 = score(doc=1238,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 1238, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1238)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The emerging network environment brings access to an increasing population of heterogeneous repositories. Inevitably, these, have quite diverse metadata vocabularies (categorization codes, classification numbers, index and thesaurus terms). So, necessarily, the number of metadata vocabularies that are accessible but unfamiliar for any individual searcher is increasing steeply. When an unfamiliar metadata vocabulary is encountered, how is a searcher to know which codes or terms will lead to what is wanted? This paper reports work at the University of California, Berkeley, on the design and development of English language indexes to metadata vocabularies. Further details and the current status of the work can be found at the project website http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/research/metadata/
    Type
    a

Authors

Types

Themes