Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Buckland, M."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Buckland, M.: Documentation, information science, and library science in the USA (1996) 0.01
    0.009925711 = product of:
      0.024814278 = sum of:
        0.012184162 = weight(_text_:a in 3973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012184162 = score(doc=3973,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 3973, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3973)
        0.012630116 = product of:
          0.025260232 = sum of:
            0.025260232 = weight(_text_:information in 3973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025260232 = score(doc=3973,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 3973, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3973)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Addresses 3 related questions: why was the work of the European documentalists largely ignored in in the USA, before the 2nd World War; what was the information science versus library science about; technological innovation was a vital force in library science in the late 19th century and after 1950, why was it not a vital force in between?. Examination of the technological background and of the Graduate Library School, University of Chicago, suggests that there was a temporary paradigm change away from design and technological innovation. Arguments over information science reflected a reversal of that paradigm
    Source
    Information processing and management. 32(1996) no.1, S.63-76
    Type
    a
  2. Buckland, M.: ¬The landscape of information science : the American Society for Information Science at 62 (1999) 0.01
    0.009554823 = product of:
      0.023887057 = sum of:
        0.008258085 = weight(_text_:a in 4344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008258085 = score(doc=4344,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 4344, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4344)
        0.015628971 = product of:
          0.031257942 = sum of:
            0.031257942 = weight(_text_:information in 4344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031257942 = score(doc=4344,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 4344, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4344)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Founded in 1937 as the American Documentation Institution, the ASIS is 62 years old. Information science includes 2 fundamental different traditions: a 'document' traditiion concerned with signifying objects and their use; and a 'computational' tradition of applying algorithmic, logical, mathematical, and mechanical techniques to information management. Both traditions have been deeply influenced by technological modernism: Technology, standards, systems, and efficiency enable progress. Both traditions are needed. Information Science is rooted in part in humanities and qualitative social sciences. The landscape of Information Science is complex. An ecumenical view is needed
    Content
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes: The 50th Anniversary of the Journal of the American Society for Information Science. Pt.1: The Journal, its society, and the future of print
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.11, S.970-974
    Type
    a
  3. Buckland, M.: Prototyping enhanced online search capability (1993) 0.01
    0.008911168 = product of:
      0.02227792 = sum of:
        0.013347079 = weight(_text_:a in 7804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013347079 = score(doc=7804,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 7804, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7804)
        0.0089308405 = product of:
          0.017861681 = sum of:
            0.017861681 = weight(_text_:information in 7804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017861681 = score(doc=7804,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 7804, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7804)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on a project to create OASIS (Otlet's Adaptive Searcher Information Service) which uses a workstation as a front end connected over the Internet to a large second generation online library catalogue. Preprocessing in the front end enables the searcher to submit new commands which the front end passes on to the host in a form acceptable to the host. Postprocessing by the front end of downloaded sets permits 2 stage retrieval startegies, and, thereby enhanced retrieval capabilities not supported by the host
    Imprint
    Medford, NJ : Learned Information
    Type
    a
  4. Buckland, M.; Plaunt, C.: On the construction of selection systems (1994) 0.01
    0.008193462 = product of:
      0.020483656 = sum of:
        0.0068111527 = weight(_text_:a in 2221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0068111527 = score(doc=2221,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 2221, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2221)
        0.013672504 = product of:
          0.027345007 = sum of:
            0.027345007 = weight(_text_:information in 2221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027345007 = score(doc=2221,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.3359395 = fieldWeight in 2221, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2221)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the structure and components of information storage and retrieval systems and information searching and filtering systems and analyzes the tasks performed in these systems. Argues that all information storage and retrieval systems can be represented by combinations of these components
    Type
    a
  5. Buckland, M.; Hahn, T.B.: History of documentation and information science : Introduction (1997) 0.01
    0.008134423 = product of:
      0.020336056 = sum of:
        0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 49) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00770594 = score(doc=49,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 49, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=49)
        0.012630116 = product of:
          0.025260232 = sum of:
            0.025260232 = weight(_text_:information in 49) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025260232 = score(doc=49,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 49, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=49)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the substantial increase during the 90s in the quality and quatity of research on the history of documentation and information science. Introduces the 14 articles and 2 bibliographies in these 2 special issues
    Footnote
    Contribution to part 1 of a 2 part series on the history of documentation and information science
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 48(1997) no.4, S.285-288
    Type
    a
  6. Buckland, M.: Information and information systems (1991) 0.01
    0.0072316155 = product of:
      0.018079039 = sum of:
        0.005448922 = weight(_text_:a in 831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005448922 = score(doc=831,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 831, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=831)
        0.012630116 = product of:
          0.025260232 = sum of:
            0.025260232 = weight(_text_:information in 831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025260232 = score(doc=831,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 831, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=831)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    "Buckland provides the forst straightforward text that deals with defining the terms, the systems, and some of the fundamental issues in an intelligent, comprehensive, non-technical manner ... a valuable library school text"
    COMPASS
    Information retrieval
    Subject
    Information retrieval
  7. Buckland, M.: On the nature of records management theory (1995) 0.01
    0.007189882 = product of:
      0.017974705 = sum of:
        0.0068111527 = weight(_text_:a in 2270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0068111527 = score(doc=2270,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 2270, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2270)
        0.011163551 = product of:
          0.022327103 = sum of:
            0.022327103 = weight(_text_:information in 2270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022327103 = score(doc=2270,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 2270, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2270)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the nature of records management theory, including information retrieval, record life cycle, and information policy. Concludes that records management theory should not be seen in isolation and need not be unique to records management. Outlines functional, professional, and educational contexts of records management theory, with examples
    Type
    a
  8. Buckland, M.: Emanuel Goldberg, electronic document retrieval, and Vannevar Bush's Memex (1992) 0.01
    0.005735424 = product of:
      0.0143385595 = sum of:
        0.004767807 = weight(_text_:a in 2340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004767807 = score(doc=2340,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 2340, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2340)
        0.009570752 = product of:
          0.019141505 = sum of:
            0.019141505 = weight(_text_:information in 2340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019141505 = score(doc=2340,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 2340, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2340)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Vannevar Bush's famous article, 'As we may think' (Atlantic monthly 176(1945) S.101-108) described an imaginary information retrieval machine, the Memex. The Memex is usually viewed, unhistorically, in relation to subsequent developments using digital computers. This study reconstructs the little-known background of information retrieval in and before 1939 when 'As we may think' was originally written. The Memex was based on Bush's work during 1938-40 in developing an improved photoelectric microfilm selector, an electronic retrieval technology pioneered by Emanuel Goldberg of Zeiss, Ikon Dresden, in the 1920s. Visionary statements by Paul Otlet (1934) and Walter Schürmeyer (1935) and the development of electronic document retrieval technology before Bush are examined
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 43(1992) no.4, S.284-294
    Type
    a
  9. Buckland, M.; Gey, F.: ¬The relationship between recall and precision (1994) 0.01
    0.0056083994 = product of:
      0.014020998 = sum of:
        0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 7204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00770594 = score(doc=7204,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 7204, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7204)
        0.006315058 = product of:
          0.012630116 = sum of:
            0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 7204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012630116 = score(doc=7204,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 7204, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7204)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Empirical studies of retrieval performance have shown a tendency for Precision to decline as Recall increases. Examines the nature of the relationship between recall and the number of documents retrieved, between precision and the number of documents retrieved, and precision and recall are described in the context of different assumptions about retrieval performance
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45(1994) no.1, S.12-19
    Type
    a
  10. Hahn, T.B.; Buckland, M.: Historical studies in information science (1998) 0.00
    0.003789035 = product of:
      0.018945174 = sum of:
        0.018945174 = product of:
          0.03789035 = sum of:
            0.03789035 = weight(_text_:information in 5012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03789035 = score(doc=5012,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.46549138 = fieldWeight in 5012, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5012)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Education for information 18(2000) no.4, S.343-346 (M.H. Heine)
    Imprint
    Medford, NJ : Information Today for the American Society for Information science
  11. Buckland, M.: Redesigning library services : a manifesto (1992) 0.00
    0.0016346768 = product of:
      0.008173384 = sum of:
        0.008173384 = weight(_text_:a in 2310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008173384 = score(doc=2310,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 2310, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2310)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  12. Buckland, M.; Chen, A.; Chen, H.M.; Kim, Y.; Lam, B.; Larson, R.; Norgard, B.; Purat, J.; Gey, F.: Mapping entry vocabulary to unfamiliar metadata vocabularies (1999) 0.00
    0.0014156717 = product of:
      0.007078358 = sum of:
        0.007078358 = weight(_text_:a in 1238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007078358 = score(doc=1238,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 1238, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1238)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The emerging network environment brings access to an increasing population of heterogeneous repositories. Inevitably, these, have quite diverse metadata vocabularies (categorization codes, classification numbers, index and thesaurus terms). So, necessarily, the number of metadata vocabularies that are accessible but unfamiliar for any individual searcher is increasing steeply. When an unfamiliar metadata vocabulary is encountered, how is a searcher to know which codes or terms will lead to what is wanted? This paper reports work at the University of California, Berkeley, on the design and development of English language indexes to metadata vocabularies. Further details and the current status of the work can be found at the project website http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/research/metadata/
    Type
    a