Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Buckland, M.K."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Buckland, M.K.; Butler, M.H.; Norgard, B.A.; Plaunt, C.: OASIS: a front end for prototyping catalog enhancements (1992) 0.01
    0.012614732 = product of:
      0.050458927 = sum of:
        0.050458927 = product of:
          0.10091785 = sum of:
            0.10091785 = weight(_text_:22 in 5405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10091785 = score(doc=5405,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5405, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5405)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 10(1992) no.4, S.7-22
  2. Buckland, M.K.; Liu, Z.: History of information science (1995) 0.01
    0.006307366 = product of:
      0.025229463 = sum of:
        0.025229463 = product of:
          0.050458927 = sum of:
            0.050458927 = weight(_text_:22 in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050458927 = score(doc=4226,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    13. 6.1996 19:22:20
  3. Buckland, M.K.: OASIS: a front-end for prototyping catalog enhancements (1992) 0.01
    0.005518945 = product of:
      0.02207578 = sum of:
        0.02207578 = product of:
          0.04415156 = sum of:
            0.04415156 = weight(_text_:22 in 4546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04415156 = score(doc=4546,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4546, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4546)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 10(1992) no.4, S.7-22
  4. Buckland, M.K.: What is a 'document'? (1997) 0.01
    0.0051703374 = product of:
      0.02068135 = sum of:
        0.02068135 = product of:
          0.0413627 = sum of:
            0.0413627 = weight(_text_:access in 1002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0413627 = score(doc=1002,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.2621377 = fieldWeight in 1002, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1002)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Ordinarily the word document denotes a textual record. Increasingliy sophisticated attempts to provide access to the rapidly growing quantity of available documents raised questions about what should be considered a document. Paul Otlet and other developed a functional view of document and discussed whether sculpture, museum objects, and live animals, could be considered documents. Suzanne Briet equates document with organized physical evidence. These ideas appear to resemble notions of 'material culture' in cultural anthropology and 'object as signs' in semiotics. Others, especially in the USA took a narrower view. New digital technology renews old questions and also old confusions between medium, message and meaning

Types