Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Buckland, M.K."
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Buckland, M.K.; Chen, A.; Gebbie, M.; Kim, Y.; Norgard, B.: Variation by subdomain in indexes to knowledge organization systems (2000) 0.01 
    0.011874698 = product of:
  0.047498792 = sum of:
    0.047498792 = product of:
      0.094997585 = sum of:
        0.094997585 = weight(_text_:organization in 97) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.094997585 = score(doc=97,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.5284991 = fieldWeight in 97, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=97)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Bibliographies and their knowledge organization systems commonly cover broad topical areas. Indexes to knowledge organization systems, such as the Subject Index to the Dewey Decimal Classification, provide a general index to the entirety. However, every community and every specialty develops its own specialized vocabulary. An index derived from the specialized use of language within a single subdomain could well be different from a general-purpose index for all domains and preferable for that subdomain. Statistical association techniques can be used to create indexes to knowledge systems. A preliminary analysis based on the INSPEC database shows that subdomain indexes differ significantly from each other and from a general index. The greater the polysemy of individual words the greater difference in the indexes
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.7
    Source
    Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al
  2. Buckland, M.K.: Democratic theory in library information science (2008) 0.01 
    0.0076767267 = product of:
  0.030706907 = sum of:
    0.030706907 = weight(_text_:information in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030706907 = score(doc=1962,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.3469568 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    A recent article by Joseph Buschman regrets that democratic theory is an unfinished idea. The argument appears to assume an essential relationship between library and information science (LIS) and democratic theory. Libraries services are important for undemocratic purposes also, and like other sociotechnical systems, partake on the cultural context in which they are deployed.
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Buschman, J.: Democratic theory in library information science: toward an emendation. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.10, S.1483-1496.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.9, S.1534
  3. Buckland, M.K.: Five grand challenges for library research : paradox of the global information infrastructure (2003) 0.00 
    0.0025748524 = product of:
  0.01029941 = sum of:
    0.01029941 = weight(_text_:information in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01029941 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Authors