Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Buckland, M.K."
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Buckland, M.K.: Knowledge organization and the technology of intellectual work (2014) 0.02
    0.024208223 = product of:
      0.06052056 = sum of:
        0.044976793 = weight(_text_:technology in 1399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044976793 = score(doc=1399,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.32906836 = fieldWeight in 1399, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1399)
        0.015543767 = product of:
          0.031087535 = sum of:
            0.031087535 = weight(_text_:22 in 1399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031087535 = score(doc=1399,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16070013 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04589033 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1399, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1399)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Since ancient times intellectual work has required tools for writing, documents for reading, and bibliographies for finding, not to mention more specialized techniques and technologies. Direct personal discussion is often impractical and we depend on documents instead. Document technology evolved through writing, printing, telecommunications, copying, and computing and facilitated an 'information flood' which motivated important knowledge organization initiatives, especially in the nineteenth century (library science, bibliography, documentation). Electronics and the Internet amplified these trends. As an example we consider an initiative to provide shared access to the working notes of editors preparing scholarly editions of historically important texts. For the future, we can project trends leading to ubiquitous recording, pervasive representations, simultaneous interaction regardless of geography, and powerful analysis and visualization of the records resulting from that ubiquitous recording. This evolving situation has implications for publishing, archival practice, and knowledge organization. The passing of time is of special interest in knowledge organization because knowing is cultural, living, and always changing. Technique and technology are also cultural ("material culture") but fixed and inanimate, as can be seen in the obsolescence of subject headings, which remain inscribed while culture moves on. The tension between the benefits of technology and the limitations imposed by fixity in a changing world provide a central tension in knowledge organization over time.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  2. Buckland, M.K.: Interrogating spatial analogies relating to knowledge organization : Paul Otlet and others (2012) 0.01
    0.0072506317 = product of:
      0.036253158 = sum of:
        0.036253158 = product of:
          0.072506316 = sum of:
            0.072506316 = weight(_text_:aspects in 5555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.072506316 = score(doc=5555,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20741826 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04589033 = queryNorm
                0.3495657 = fieldWeight in 5555, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5555)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The author provides an examination of how ideas about place and space have been used in thinking about the organization of knowledge. The spatial analogies of Paul Otlet (1868-1944) in relation to his overall vision are traditional and conventional. Notions of space, place, position, location, and movement are frequent in the work of other leading innovators (Martin Schrettinger, Melvil Dewey, Wilhelm Ostwald, Emanuel Goldberg, and Suzanne Briet) concerning specific practical aspects of knowledge organization. Otlet's spatial imagery is more original and more ingenious when applied to technical problems compared to his overall vision.