Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Burghardt, M."
  • × language_ss:"d"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Burghardt, M.; Wolff, C.: Zentren für Digital Humanities in Deutschland (2015) 0.00 
    0.0036692512 = product of:
  0.011007753 = sum of:
    0.011007753 = product of:
      0.055038765 = sum of:
        0.055038765 = weight(_text_:29 in 1834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055038765 = score(doc=1834,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.118011735 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0335481 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 1834, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1834)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    6.12.2015 17:38:29
  2. Burghardt, M.; Wolff, C.; Womser-Hacker, C.: Informationsinfrastruktur und informationswissenschaftliche Methoden in den digitalen Geisteswissenschaften (2015) 0.00 
    0.003030203 = product of:
  0.009090609 = sum of:
    0.009090609 = product of:
      0.045453046 = sum of:
        0.045453046 = weight(_text_:22 in 1838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045453046 = score(doc=1838,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117479734 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0335481 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1838, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1838)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    6.12.2015 17:22:08
  3. Burghardt, M.: Annotationsergonomie : Design-Empfehlungen für linguistische Annotationswerkzeuge (2012) 0.00 
    0.0025368028 = product of:
  0.007610408 = sum of:
    0.007610408 = product of:
      0.03805204 = sum of:
        0.03805204 = weight(_text_:28 in 556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03805204 = score(doc=556,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12017813 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0335481 = queryNorm
            0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 556, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=556)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Dieser Beitrag skizziert die Kluft, die zwischen linguistischen Annotationswerkzeugen und etablierten Methoden des Usability Engineering besteht. Eine Evaluationsstudie dreier exemplarischer Annotationstools zeigt unterschiedliche Kategorien von Usability-Problemen auf, welche die Basis für eine Sammlung von 28 Design-Empfehlungen für benutzerfreundliche Annotationswerkzeuge bilden.

Authors