Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)
- Did you mean:
- rswk_00%3a%22Dokumentationssprache %2f heterogenity%c3%a4t %2f information retrieval %2f ranking %2f evaluation%22 1
- rswk_00%3a%22Dokumentationssprache %2f heterogenen%c3%a4t %2f information retrieval %2f ranking %2f evaluation%22 1
- rswk_00%3a%22Dokumentationssprache %2f heterogenität%c3%a4t %2f information retrieval %2f ranking %2f evaluation%22 1
- rswk_00%3a%22Dokumentationssprache %2f heterogeneity%c3%a4t %2f information retrieval %2f ranking %2f evaluation%22 1
- rswk_00%3a%22Dokumentationssprache %2f heterogener%c3%a4t %2f information retrieval %2f ranking %2f evaluation%22 1
-
Burnett, M.; Fisher, C.; Jones, R.: InTEXT precision indexing in TREC4 (1996)
0.00
0.0037308172 = product of: 0.03730817 = sum of: 0.03730817 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.03730817 = score(doc=7529,freq=2.0), product of: 0.093026035 = queryWeight, product of: 3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218) 0.030753274 = queryNorm 0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 7529, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218) 0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7529) 0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Source
- The Fourth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-4). Ed.: K. Harman