-
Burrell, Q.L.: Predicting future citation behavior (2003)
0.01
0.01300203 = product of:
0.02600406 = sum of:
0.02600406 = product of:
0.05200812 = sum of:
0.05200812 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05200812 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 29. 3.2003 19:22:48
-
Burrell, Q.L.: Measuring similarity of concentration between different informetric distributions : two new approaches (2005)
0.01
0.012243311 = product of:
0.024486622 = sum of:
0.024486622 = product of:
0.048973244 = sum of:
0.048973244 = weight(_text_:work in 3410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048973244 = score(doc=3410,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.2433148 = fieldWeight in 3410, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3410)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- From its earliest days, much investigative work in informetrics has been concerned with inequality aspects. Beginning with the weIl-known Gin! coefficient as a measure of the concentration/inequality of productivity within a single data set, in this study we look at the problem of measuring relative inequallty of productivity between two data sets. A measure originally proposed by Dagum (1987), analogous to the Gin! coefficient, is discussed and developed with both theoretical and empir!cal illustrations. From this we derive a standardized measure-the relative concentration coefficient-based an the notion of "relative economic affluence" also introduced by Dagum (1987). Finally, a new standardized measure-the co-concentration coefficient, in some ways analogous to the correlation coefficient-is defined. The merits and drawbacks of these two measures are discussed and illustrated. Their value will be most readily appreclated in comparative empirical studies.
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.01
0.011144597 = product of:
0.022289194 = sum of:
0.022289194 = product of:
0.04457839 = sum of:
0.04457839 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04457839 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05