-
Burrell, Q.L.: Predicting future citation behavior (2003)
0.03
0.027584592 = product of:
0.055169184 = sum of:
0.055169184 = sum of:
0.004850517 = weight(_text_:s in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004850517 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
0.050318666 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050318666 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18579373 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 29. 3.2003 19:22:48
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.5, S.372-378
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.02
0.023643933 = product of:
0.047287866 = sum of:
0.047287866 = sum of:
0.0041575856 = weight(_text_:s in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0041575856 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.043130282 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043130282 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18579373 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
- Source
- Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.6, S.1451-1464
-
Burrell, Q.L.: Formulae for the h-index : a lack of robustness in Lotkaian informetrics? (2013)
0.02
0.020352896 = sum of:
0.018274104 = product of:
0.07309642 = sum of:
0.07309642 = weight(_text_:authors in 977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07309642 = score(doc=977,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2418733 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 977, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=977)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0020787928 = product of:
0.0041575856 = sum of:
0.0041575856 = weight(_text_:s in 977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0041575856 = score(doc=977,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 977, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=977)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In one of the first attempts at providing a mathematical framework for the Hirsch index, Egghe and Rousseau (2006) assumed the standard Lotka model for an author's citation distribution to derive a delightfully simple closed formula for his/her h-index. More recently, the same authors (Egghe & Rousseau, 2012b) have presented a new (implicit) formula based on the so-called shifted Lotka function to allow for the objection that the original model makes no allowance for papers receiving zero citations. Here it is shown, through a small empirical study, that the formulae actually give very similar results whether or not the uncited papers are included. However, and more important, it is found that they both seriously underestimate the true h-index, and we suggest that the reason for this is that this is a context-the citation distribution of an author-in which straightforward Lotkaian informetrics is inappropriate. Indeed, the analysis suggests that even if we restrict attention to the upper tail of the citation distribution, a simple Lotka/Pareto-like model can give misleading results.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.7, S.1504-1514
-
Burrell, Q.L.: Fitting Lotka's law : some cautionary observations on a recent paper by Newby et al. (2003) (2004)
0.00
0.0020787928 = product of:
0.0041575856 = sum of:
0.0041575856 = product of:
0.008315171 = sum of:
0.008315171 = weight(_text_:s in 6235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008315171 = score(doc=6235,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 6235, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6235)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(2004) no.13, S.1209-1210
-
Burrell, Q.L.: "Type/Token-Taken" informetrics : Some comments and further examples (2003)
0.00
0.0017323275 = product of:
0.003464655 = sum of:
0.003464655 = product of:
0.00692931 = sum of:
0.00692931 = weight(_text_:s in 2116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00692931 = score(doc=2116,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 2116, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2116)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.13, S.1260-1263
-
Burrell, Q.L.: Will this paper ever be cited? (2002)
0.00
0.001385862 = product of:
0.002771724 = sum of:
0.002771724 = product of:
0.005543448 = sum of:
0.005543448 = weight(_text_:s in 3183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005543448 = score(doc=3183,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 3183, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3183)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.3, S.232-235
-
Burrell, Q.L.: On Egghe's version of continuous concentration theory (2006)
0.00
0.001385862 = product of:
0.002771724 = sum of:
0.002771724 = product of:
0.005543448 = sum of:
0.005543448 = weight(_text_:s in 4903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005543448 = score(doc=4903,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4903, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4903)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.10, S.1406-1411
-
Burrell, Q.L.: Some comments on "A proposal for a dynamic h-Type Index" by Rousseau and Ye (2009)
0.00
0.001385862 = product of:
0.002771724 = sum of:
0.002771724 = product of:
0.005543448 = sum of:
0.005543448 = weight(_text_:s in 2722) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005543448 = score(doc=2722,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2722, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2722)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.2, S.418-419
-
Burrell, Q.L.: Alternative thoughts on uncitedness (2012)
0.00
0.0012126293 = product of:
0.0024252585 = sum of:
0.0024252585 = product of:
0.004850517 = sum of:
0.004850517 = weight(_text_:s in 290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004850517 = score(doc=290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=290)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.7, S.1466-1470
-
Burrell, Q.L.: "Ambiguity" ans scientometric measurement : a dissenting view (2001)
0.00
0.0010393964 = product of:
0.0020787928 = sum of:
0.0020787928 = product of:
0.0041575856 = sum of:
0.0041575856 = weight(_text_:s in 6981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0041575856 = score(doc=6981,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 6981, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6981)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.12, S.1075-1080
-
Burrell, Q.L.: Measuring similarity of concentration between different informetric distributions : two new approaches (2005)
0.00
0.0010393964 = product of:
0.0020787928 = sum of:
0.0020787928 = product of:
0.0041575856 = sum of:
0.0041575856 = weight(_text_:s in 3410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0041575856 = score(doc=3410,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3410, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3410)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.7, S.704-714
-
Burrell, Q.L.: Egghe's construction of Lorenz curves resolved (2007)
0.00
0.0010393964 = product of:
0.0020787928 = sum of:
0.0020787928 = product of:
0.0041575856 = sum of:
0.0041575856 = weight(_text_:s in 624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0041575856 = score(doc=624,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 624, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=624)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.13, S.2157-2159
-
Burrell, Q.L.: Extending Lotkaian informetrics (2008)
0.00
0.0010393964 = product of:
0.0020787928 = sum of:
0.0020787928 = product of:
0.0041575856 = sum of:
0.0041575856 = weight(_text_:s in 2126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0041575856 = score(doc=2126,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.053056188 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2126, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2126)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.5, S.1794-1807