Bury, S.: Comparison of classification schedules for libraries (1980)
0.00
0.0021060861 = product of:
0.0042121722 = sum of:
0.0042121722 = product of:
0.0084243445 = sum of:
0.0084243445 = weight(_text_:a in 1603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0084243445 = score(doc=1603,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041389145 = queryNorm
0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 1603, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1603)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Discusses the basic criteria for comparison of classification for libraries. Identifies a set of intellectual criteria, derived from the general theory of library classification as expounded by Dewey, Bliss, and Ranganathan. Compares LC, DC, and BC in relation criteria namely - order, university, hospitality, adaptability, terminology, relationship, synthesis, notational features - simplicity, brevity, expressiveness, specifity, synonymity, flexibility, correlation, case of use, revision and practical use. Highlights the value of comparative studies among classification schemes
- Source
- Library science with a slant to documentation. 17(1980), S.73-82
- Type
- a