Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
-
×
author_ss:"Bury, S."
-
×
theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
-
×
year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
- Did you mean:
- lcsh's%3a%20knowledge%2c sociology of%22 2
- lcsh's%3a%20knowledge%2c soziologe of%22 2
- lcshs%3a%20knowledge%2c sociology of%22 2
- lcsh's%3a%20knowledge%2c semiology of%22 2
- lcshs%3a%20knowledge%2c soziologe of%22 2
-
Bury, S.: Comparison of classification schedules for libraries (1980)
0.00
0.003865822 = product of: 0.011597466 = sum of: 0.011597466 = product of: 0.023194931 = sum of: 0.023194931 = weight(_text_:of in 1603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.023194931 = score(doc=1603,freq=12.0), product of: 0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of: 1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218) 0.043811057 = queryNorm 0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 1603, product of: 3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of: 12.0 = termFreq=12.0 1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218) 0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1603) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Discusses the basic criteria for comparison of classification for libraries. Identifies a set of intellectual criteria, derived from the general theory of library classification as expounded by Dewey, Bliss, and Ranganathan. Compares LC, DC, and BC in relation criteria namely - order, university, hospitality, adaptability, terminology, relationship, synthesis, notational features - simplicity, brevity, expressiveness, specifity, synonymity, flexibility, correlation, case of use, revision and practical use. Highlights the value of comparative studies among classification schemes
-
Foskett, D.J.; Bury, S.: Concept organisation and universal classification schemes (1982)
0.00
0.0023673228 = product of: 0.0071019684 = sum of: 0.0071019684 = product of: 0.014203937 = sum of: 0.014203937 = weight(_text_:of in 17) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.014203937 = score(doc=17,freq=2.0), product of: 0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of: 1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218) 0.043811057 = queryNorm 0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 17, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218) 0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=17) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Universal classification I: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg