Buxton, A.B.: Computer searching of UDC numbers (1990)
0.00
0.0033350834 = product of:
0.033350833 = sum of:
0.01488452 = weight(_text_:und in 5406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01488452 = score(doc=5406,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0506532 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.022854157 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 5406, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5406)
0.01488452 = weight(_text_:und in 5406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01488452 = score(doc=5406,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0506532 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.022854157 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 5406, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5406)
0.003581792 = weight(_text_:s in 5406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003581792 = score(doc=5406,freq=2.0), product of:
0.024847899 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.022854157 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 5406, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5406)
0.1 = coord(3/30)
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch die Beiträge von Hermes / Bischoff und Gödert bzw. das DORS Projekt im Zusammenhang mit der DDC
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 46(1990) no.3, S.193-217
Buxton, A.B.: UDC in online systems (1991)
0.00
0.0020651424 = product of:
0.020651422 = sum of:
0.008357677 = weight(_text_:in in 7935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008357677 = score(doc=7935,freq=10.0), product of:
0.03108747 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.022854157 = queryNorm
0.26884392 = fieldWeight in 7935, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7935)
0.0023878615 = weight(_text_:s in 7935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0023878615 = score(doc=7935,freq=2.0), product of:
0.024847899 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.022854157 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 7935, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7935)
0.009905885 = product of:
0.029717654 = sum of:
0.029717654 = weight(_text_:university in 7935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029717654 = score(doc=7935,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08765816 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8355455 = idf(docFreq=2594, maxDocs=44218)
0.022854157 = queryNorm
0.33901754 = fieldWeight in 7935, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8355455 = idf(docFreq=2594, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7935)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(3/30)
- Abstract
- Examines ho well UDC numbers performs as a subject retrieval device in online systems. Discusses: truncation, coordination, USC as a discipline based scheme, ranges, and requirements in search software. Gives examples of UDC in pre-coordinated and post-coordinated working systems. Discusses the possible use of UDC as a thesaurus. Outlines improvements that would enable its use in online retrieval
- Pages
- S.157-161
- Source
- Standards for the international exchange of bibliographic information: papers presented at a course held at the School of Library, Archive and Information Studies, University College, London, 3-18 August 1990. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
