Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Campanario, J.M."
  1. Campanario, J.M.: Using 'Citation Classics' to study the incidence of serendipity in scientific discovery (1996) 0.00 
    6.1163254E-4 = product of:
  0.018348975 = sum of:
    0.018348975 = weight(_text_:21 in 6693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018348975 = score(doc=6693,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06701087 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021630857 = queryNorm
        0.27382088 = fieldWeight in 6693, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6693)
  0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    Date
    2. 3.1997 12:16:21
  2. Campanario, J.M.; Acedo, E.: Rejecting highly cited papers : the views of scientists who encounter resistance to their discoveries from other scientists (2007) 0.00 
    3.6116174E-4 = product of:
  0.010834851 = sum of:
    0.010834851 = weight(_text_:20 in 273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010834851 = score(doc=273,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059459355 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021630857 = queryNorm
        0.18222281 = fieldWeight in 273, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=273)
  0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    Date
    29. 4.2007 20:18:05
  3. Campanario, J.M.: Self-citations that contribute to the journal impact factor : an investment-benefit-yield analysis (2010) 0.00 
    3.6116174E-4 = product of:
  0.010834851 = sum of:
    0.010834851 = weight(_text_:20 in 4124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010834851 = score(doc=4124,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059459355 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021630857 = queryNorm
        0.18222281 = fieldWeight in 4124, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4124)
  0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    Abstract
    The variables investment, benefit, and yield were defined to study the influence of journal self-citations on the impact factor. Investment represents the share of journal self-citations that contribute to the impact factor. Benefit is defined as the ratio of journal impact factor including self-citations to journal impact factor without self-citations. Yield is the relationship between benefit and investment. I selected all journals included in 2008 in the Science Citation Index version of Journal Citation Reports. After deleting 482 records for reasons to be explained, I used a final set of 6,138 journals to study the distribution of the variables defined above. The distribution of benefit differed from the distribution of investment and yield. The top 20-ranked journals were not the same for all three variables. The yield of self-citations on the journal impact factor was, in general, very modest.
  4. Campanario, J.M.: Large increases and decreases in journal impact factors in only one year : the effect of journal self-citations (2011) 0.00 
    3.41913E-4 = product of:
  0.010257389 = sum of:
    0.010257389 = product of:
      0.020514779 = sum of:
        0.020514779 = weight(_text_:22 in 4187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020514779 = score(doc=4187,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07574758 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021630857 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4187, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4187)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    Date
    22. 1.2011 12:53:00
  5. Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996) 0.00 
    2.9306827E-4 = product of:
  0.008792047 = sum of:
    0.008792047 = product of:
      0.017584095 = sum of:
        0.017584095 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017584095 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07574758 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021630857 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    Abstract
    In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles

Years

Themes