Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"CannCasciato, D."
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. CannCasciato, D.: Ethical considerations in classification practice : a case study using creationism and intelligent design (2011) 0.07 
    0.06850691 = product of:
  0.13701382 = sum of:
    0.13701382 = sum of:
      0.08792751 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08792751 = score(doc=1893,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051756795 = queryNorm
          0.43106002 = fieldWeight in 1893, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1893)
      0.049086317 = weight(_text_:22 in 1893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049086317 = score(doc=1893,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051756795 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1893, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1893)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article re-visits a scenario from 1987: a university president required a library director to reclassify some materials into a science classification. The author looks at the prominence of the Code of Ethics of the American Library Association in the general library literature and in classification and cataloging practice literature. The issue of censorship is also discussed. The author then reviews classification for Creationism and Intelligent design and some decision-making processes one could use when deciding on the professional ethics of such a request, concluding that in some cases the ethical action might indeed be to go ahead with the reclassification.
    Date
    25. 5.2015 18:22:47
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 49(2011) no.5, S.408-427
  2. CannCasciato, D.: Calling for Berserkers : LCSH, the OLUC, and cooperative cataloging (1993) 0.02 
    0.01776404 = product of:
  0.03552808 = sum of:
    0.03552808 = product of:
      0.07105616 = sum of:
        0.07105616 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 7801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07105616 = score(doc=7801,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 7801, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7801)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  3. CannCasciato, D.: ¬The OLUC from a NACO point of view : eliminating derived search keys (1994) 0.01 
    0.014024663 = product of:
  0.028049326 = sum of:
    0.028049326 = product of:
      0.05609865 = sum of:
        0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 6575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05609865 = score(doc=6575,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6575, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6575)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    OCLC systems and services. 10(1994) no.4, S.22-25

Years