Zhao, D.; Strotmann, A.; Cappello, A.: In-text function of author self-citations : implications for research evaluation practice (2018)
0.00
0.0021413704 = product of:
0.014989593 = sum of:
0.014989593 = weight(_text_:with in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014989593 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09383348 = queryWeight, product of:
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.038938753 = queryNorm
0.15974675 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Author self-citations were examined as to their function, frequency, and location in the full text of research articles and compared with external citations. Function analysis was based on manual coding of a small dataset in the field of library and information studies, whereas the analyses by frequency and location used both this small dataset and a large dataset from PubMed Central. Strong evidence was found that self-citations appear more likely to serve as substantial citations in a text than do external citations. This finding challenges previous studies that assumed that self-citations should be discounted or even removed and suggests that self-citations should be given more weight in citation analysis, if anything.