Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Carlyle, A."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Carlyle, A.: Understanding FRBR as a conceptual model : FRBR and the bibliographic universe (2006) 0.02 
    0.01926614 = product of:
  0.028899208 = sum of:
    0.010535319 = weight(_text_:a in 1050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010535319 = score(doc=1050,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.20223314 = fieldWeight in 1050, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1050)
    0.01836389 = product of:
      0.03672778 = sum of:
        0.03672778 = weight(_text_:22 in 1050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03672778 = score(doc=1050,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1050, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1050)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) presents a complex conceptual model. Because of this, it is not easy for everyone to understand. The purpose of this paper is to make some of the more difficult aspects of the FRBR model, in particular the Croup 1 entities work, expression, manifestation, and item, easier to understand by placing FRBR in the context of what it is: a conceptual entity-relationship model. To this end, a definition of the term "model" is presented, a variety of types and junctions of models are introduced, conceptual models are discussed in detail, modeling an abstraction is explained, and different ways of interpreting FRBR are suggested. Various models used in the history of cataloging are introduced to place FRBR in the context of the historical development of document models.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  2. Carlyle, A.: Developing organized information displays for voluminous worls : a study of user clustering behavior (2001) 0.01 
    0.005364322 = product of:
  0.016092965 = sum of:
    0.016092965 = weight(_text_:a in 819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016092965 = score(doc=819,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.3089162 = fieldWeight in 819, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=819)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Type
    a
  3. Carlyle, A.: ¬An interview with Martha M. Yee (2000) 0.00 
    0.0043799505 = product of:
  0.013139851 = sum of:
    0.013139851 = weight(_text_:a in 3897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013139851 = score(doc=3897,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 3897, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3897)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Type
    a
  4. Carlyle, A.; Ranger, S.; Summerlin, J.: Making the pieces fit : little women, works, and the pursuit of quality (2008) 0.00 
    0.0040970687 = product of:
  0.012291206 = sum of:
    0.012291206 = weight(_text_:a in 799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012291206 = score(doc=799,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 799, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=799)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    In current cataloging practice, the identification of an item as a member of a particular work set is accomplished by assigning a main entry heading, or main entry citation, in the bibliographic record representing that item. The main entry citation is normally comprised of a primary author name and the uniform title associated with the work. However, the quality of bibliographic records varies, and this means of identification is not universally used by catalogers. Thus, consistent identification and retrieval of records representing editions of works is not guaranteed. Research is reported that investigates the extent to which records that are members of a particular work set may be automatically identified as such.
    Type
    a
  5. Lee, H.-L.; Carlyle, A.: Academic library gateways to online information : a taxonomy of organizational structures (2003) 0.00 
    0.00325127 = product of:
  0.009753809 = sum of:
    0.009753809 = weight(_text_:a in 2698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009753809 = score(doc=2698,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 2698, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2698)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Reports a preliminary analysis of organizational schemes applied by academic libraries worldwide to arrange their electronic resources an their Web-based information gateways. The unsystematic sample consists of 41 academic libraries in 10 countries representing 4 languages, Chinese, English, German, and Spanish. The study reveals a widely accepted practice in applying 6 simplistic methods to organizing online information: by resource type, alphabetical by title, alphabetical by subject (mostly discipline and genre), by vendor/publisher, by broad classification, and random. In addition, it notes a marked difference between libraries in the English-speaking world and those in other countries in that the former present significantly more systematic characteristics.
    Type
    a
  6. Carlyle, A.; Fusco, L.M.: Equivalence in Tillett's bibliographic relationships taxonomy : a revision (2003) 0.00 
    0.00325127 = product of:
  0.009753809 = sum of:
    0.009753809 = weight(_text_:a in 2719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009753809 = score(doc=2719,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 2719, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2719)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This paper analyzes the equivalence relationship as presented by Barbara B. Tillett in her taxonomy of bibliographic relationships. Tillett's definition of equivalence comprised of two parts, first, that equivalence holds between exacts copies of bibliographic items or documents, and second, that it may hold between an original item and a reproduction, if the intellectual content and authorship are presented. It is proposed that this definition is too restrictive, excluding relationships among items that may, based an contexts of use, act as equivalent. Further, it is suggested that a taxonomy of bibliographic relationships be constructed as holding between document representations as opposed to documents themselves. A revised definition of equivalence is offered in which equivalence relationships may hold among document representations in which one or more document properties described in the representations are shared. One advantage of this revision is that it subsumes Tillett's shared characteristic relationship, simplifying the taxonomy.
    Type
    a
  7. Carlyle, A.; Summerlin, J.: Transforming catalog displays : records clustering for works of fiction (2000) 0.00 
    0.0022989952 = product of:
  0.006896985 = sum of:
    0.006896985 = weight(_text_:a in 100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006896985 = score(doc=100,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 100, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=100)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Displays grouping retrieved bibliographic record sets into categories or clusters may communicate search results more quickly and effectively to users than current catalogs providing long alphabetical lists of records. In this research, automatic clustering based on types of relationships, including translation, presence of illustrations, etc., is proposed as a model for clustering. Bibliographic records associated with three large fiction works (Kidnapped by Robert Lewis Stevenson, Bleak House by Charles Dickens, and Three Musketeers by Alexandre Dumas) are analyzed to discover the presence of relationship-type indicators to determine the extent to which an automatic clustering program would succeed in clustering work records. Preliminary results show that 94 percent of the records in this study contained indicators of cluster type that would allow them to be correctly identified automatically
    Type
    a
  8. Carlyle, A.; Summerlin, J.: Transforming catalog displays : record clustering for works of fiction (2002) 0.00 
    0.0021899752 = product of:
  0.0065699257 = sum of:
    0.0065699257 = weight(_text_:a in 5626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0065699257 = score(doc=5626,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 5626, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5626)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Type
    a

Authors

Themes