Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
- Did you mean:
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 15860 allgemeines %2f medien- und kommunikationswissenschaften%2c kommunikationsdesign %2f formen der kommunikation und des kommunikationsdesigns %2f kommunikationsdesign in elektronischen medien%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 15860 allgemeinen %2f medien- und kommunikationswissenschaften%2c kommunikationsdesign %2f formen der kommunikation und des kommunikationsdesigns %2f kommunikationsdesign in elektronischen medien%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 15860 allgemeines %2f medien- und kommunikationswissenschaften%2c kommunikationsdesign %2f firmen der kommunikation und des kommunikationsdesigns %2f kommunikationsdesign in elektronischen medien%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 15860 allgemeines %2f medien- und kommunikationswissenschaften%2c kommunikationsdesign %2f formen der kommunikation und des kommunikationsdesign %2f kommunikationsdesign in elektronischen medien%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 15860 allgemeines %2f medien- und kommunikationswissenschaften%2c kommunikationsdesigns %2f formen der kommunikation und des kommunikationsdesigns %2f kommunikationsdesign in elektronischen medien%22 2
-
Carlyle, A.: Matching LSCH and user vocabulary in the library catalog (1989)
0.00
0.002903719 = product of: 0.029037189 = sum of: 0.019048017 = weight(_text_:der in 347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.019048017 = score(doc=347,freq=2.0), product of: 0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of: 2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218) 0.02879306 = queryNorm 0.29615843 = fieldWeight in 347, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218) 0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=347) 0.009989171 = weight(_text_:in in 347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.009989171 = score(doc=347,freq=4.0), product of: 0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of: 1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218) 0.02879306 = queryNorm 0.25504774 = fieldWeight in 347, product of: 2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of: 4.0 = termFreq=4.0 1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218) 0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=347) 0.1 = coord(2/20)
- Footnote
- Eine interessante Studie, die auf die Anwendung der RSWK übertragen werden könnte.
- Source
- Subject control in online catalogs. Ed.: R.P. Holley
-
Carlyle, A.: Matching LCSH and user vocabulary in the library catalog (1989)
0.00
3.531705E-4 = product of: 0.00706341 = sum of: 0.00706341 = weight(_text_:in in 449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.00706341 = score(doc=449,freq=8.0), product of: 0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of: 1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218) 0.02879306 = queryNorm 0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 449, product of: 2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of: 8.0 = termFreq=8.0 1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218) 0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=449) 0.05 = coord(1/20)
- Abstract
- Central to subject searching is the match between user vocabulary and the headings from Library of Congress Subject-Headings (LCSH) used in a library catalog. This paper evaluates previous matching studies, proposes a detailed list of matching categories, and tests LCSH in a study using these categories. Exact and partial match categories are defined for single LCSH and multiple LCSH matches to user expressions. One no-match category is included. Transaction logs from ORION, UCLA's online Information system, were used to collect user expressions for a comparison of LCSH and user language. Results show that single LCSH headings match user expressions exactly about 47% of the time; that single subject heading matches, including exact matches, comprise 74% of the total; that partial matches, to both single and multiple headings, comprise about 21% of the total; and that no match occurs 5% of the time.
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as Subject Control in Online Catalogs
Themes
- Benutzerstudien 1
- OPAC 1