Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Carlyle, A."
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Carlyle, A.: Developing organized information displays for voluminous worls : a study of user clustering behavior (2001) 0.01 
    0.012858057 = product of:
  0.032145143 = sum of:
    0.01651617 = weight(_text_:a in 819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01651617 = score(doc=819,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.3089162 = fieldWeight in 819, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=819)
    0.015628971 = product of:
      0.031257942 = sum of:
        0.031257942 = weight(_text_:information in 819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031257942 = score(doc=819,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 819, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=819)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 37(2001) no.5, S.677-699
    Type
    a
  2. Carlyle, A.: Understanding FRBR as a conceptual model : FRBR and the bibliographic universe (2006) 0.01 
    0.011863673 = product of:
  0.029659182 = sum of:
    0.010812371 = weight(_text_:a in 1050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010812371 = score(doc=1050,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.20223314 = fieldWeight in 1050, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1050)
    0.018846812 = product of:
      0.037693623 = sum of:
        0.037693623 = weight(_text_:22 in 1050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037693623 = score(doc=1050,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1050, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1050)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) presents a complex conceptual model. Because of this, it is not easy for everyone to understand. The purpose of this paper is to make some of the more difficult aspects of the FRBR model, in particular the Croup 1 entities work, expression, manifestation, and item, easier to understand by placing FRBR in the context of what it is: a conceptual entity-relationship model. To this end, a definition of the term "model" is presented, a variety of types and junctions of models are introduced, conceptual models are discussed in detail, modeling an abstraction is explained, and different ways of interpreting FRBR are suggested. Various models used in the history of cataloging are introduced to place FRBR in the context of the historical development of document models.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  3. Carlyle, A.; Ranger, S.; Summerlin, J.: Making the pieces fit : little women, works, and the pursuit of quality (2008) 0.00 
    0.0025228865 = product of:
  0.012614433 = sum of:
    0.012614433 = weight(_text_:a in 799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012614433 = score(doc=799,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 799, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=799)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    In current cataloging practice, the identification of an item as a member of a particular work set is accomplished by assigning a main entry heading, or main entry citation, in the bibliographic record representing that item. The main entry citation is normally comprised of a primary author name and the uniform title associated with the work. However, the quality of bibliographic records varies, and this means of identification is not universally used by catalogers. Thus, consistent identification and retrieval of records representing editions of works is not guaranteed. Research is reported that investigates the extent to which records that are members of a particular work set may be automatically identified as such.
    Type
    a
  4. Carlyle, A.; Fusco, L.M.: Equivalence in Tillett's bibliographic relationships taxonomy : a revision (2003) 0.00 
    0.002002062 = product of:
  0.0100103095 = sum of:
    0.0100103095 = weight(_text_:a in 2719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0100103095 = score(doc=2719,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 2719, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2719)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This paper analyzes the equivalence relationship as presented by Barbara B. Tillett in her taxonomy of bibliographic relationships. Tillett's definition of equivalence comprised of two parts, first, that equivalence holds between exacts copies of bibliographic items or documents, and second, that it may hold between an original item and a reproduction, if the intellectual content and authorship are presented. It is proposed that this definition is too restrictive, excluding relationships among items that may, based an contexts of use, act as equivalent. Further, it is suggested that a taxonomy of bibliographic relationships be constructed as holding between document representations as opposed to documents themselves. A revised definition of equivalence is offered in which equivalence relationships may hold among document representations in which one or more document properties described in the representations are shared. One advantage of this revision is that it subsumes Tillett's shared characteristic relationship, simplifying the taxonomy.
    Type
    a

Authors