Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

Carlyle, A.: Exploring bibliographic classification in new environments (1997) 0.01

0.008572357 = product of:
  0.051434137 = sum of:
    0.051434137 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051434137 = score(doc=6184,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 6184, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6184)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Theme: Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval

Efthimiadis, E.N.; Carlyle, A.: Organizing Internet resources : metadata and the Web (1997) 0.01

0.006652005 = product of:
  0.03991203 = sum of:
    0.03991203 = weight(_text_:web in 2561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03991203 = score(doc=2561,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13836423 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 2561, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2561)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Carlyle, A.: Ordering author and work records : an evaluation of collocation in online catalog displays (1996) 0.01
```
0.005000541 = product of:
  0.030003246 = sum of:
    0.030003246 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030003246 = score(doc=4383,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 4383, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4383)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
```
Abstract

To investigate the extent to which online catalogs arrange together, or collocate, records representing particular authors and works, a survey compared the displays resulting from 5 author and 5 work queries in 18 online catalogs. Dependent variables to measure collocation included the number of items irrelevant records were interfiled among relevant records. Searches for worst-case authors and works associated with large retrieval sets, including 'Homer' and 'Paradise lost', revealed the effects of Boolean versus string matching, query type, and catalog size on the collocation of relevant records. Results of the survey showed that string matching collocated relevant records more successfully than Boolean matching, that author records were collocated more successfully than work records, and, surprisingly, that catalog size had only a small effect on collocation

Carlyle, A.; Summerlin, J.: Transforming catalog displays : record clustering for works of fiction (2002) 0.01

0.005000541 = product of:
  0.030003246 = sum of:
    0.030003246 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030003246 = score(doc=5626,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 5626, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5626)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Content: Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Works as entities for information retrieval"

Carlyle, A.; Ranger, S.; Summerlin, J.: Making the pieces fit : little women, works, and the pursuit of quality (2008) 0.01
```
0.005000541 = product of:
  0.030003246 = sum of:
    0.030003246 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030003246 = score(doc=799,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 799, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=799)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
```
Abstract

In current cataloging practice, the identification of an item as a member of a particular work set is accomplished by assigning a main entry heading, or main entry citation, in the bibliographic record representing that item. The main entry citation is normally comprised of a primary author name and the uniform title associated with the work. However, the quality of bibliographic records varies, and this means of identification is not universally used by catalogers. Thus, consistent identification and retrieval of records representing editions of works is not guaranteed. Research is reported that investigates the extent to which records that are members of a particular work set may be automatically identified as such.
Lee, H.-L.; Carlyle, A.: Academic library gateways to online information : a taxonomy of organizational structures (2003) 0.00
```
0.0049890038 = product of:
  0.029934023 = sum of:
    0.029934023 = weight(_text_:web in 2698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029934023 = score(doc=2698,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13836423 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 2698, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2698)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
```
Abstract

Reports a preliminary analysis of organizational schemes applied by academic libraries worldwide to arrange their electronic resources an their Web-based information gateways. The unsystematic sample consists of 41 academic libraries in 10 countries representing 4 languages, Chinese, English, German, and Spanish. The study reveals a widely accepted practice in applying 6 simplistic methods to organizing online information: by resource type, alphabetical by title, alphabetical by subject (mostly discipline and genre), by vendor/publisher, by broad classification, and random. In addition, it notes a marked difference between libraries in the English-speaking world and those in other countries in that the former present significantly more systematic characteristics.

Carlyle, A.: ¬An interview with Martha M. Yee (2000) 0.00

0.00450831 = product of:
  0.02704986 = sum of:
    0.02704986 = product of:
      0.08114958 = sum of:
        0.08114958 = weight(_text_:29 in 3897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08114958 = score(doc=3897,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 3897, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3897)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Source: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 29(2000) no.3, S.5-19

Carlyle, A.: Fulfilling the second objective in the online catalog : schemes for organizing author and work records into usable displays (1997) 0.00
```
0.0035718149 = product of:
  0.02143089 = sum of:
    0.02143089 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02143089 = score(doc=908,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 908, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=908)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
```
Abstract

The 2nd objective of the catalogue, adopted internationally in the Paris Principles, requires that cataloguing records for particular authors and particular works be easily identified (IFLA 1991). Analysis of the requirements of the 2nd objective of the catalogue shows that it has 2 components: a retrieval component; and a display component; and that it may be interpreted broadly to include related works and works about a work or author. Investigates 2 schemes for their contributions to the creation of online catalogue displays that meet 2nd objective requirements. Analyzes the catalogue filing rule scheme to show that author and work displays in card catalogues have been composed of many groups or classes of materials that may also be used to create organized displays in online catalogues. The groups used in the filing rule scheme are based on relationships among items. Proposes a scheme based on Tillet's bibliographic relationship taxonomy to discover additional types of relationships that may be used to group record in online catalogue displays leading to a new scheme for the creation of organized display in online catalogues. Incorporates elements from both the filing rule scheme and the bibliographic relationship taxonomy to create displays that meet the requirements of the 2nd objective more fully than either scheme does alone

Carlyle, A.; Fusco, L.M.: Equivalence in Tillett's bibliographic relationships taxonomy : a revision (2003) 0.00

0.001932133 = product of:
  0.011592798 = sum of:
    0.011592798 = product of:
      0.034778394 = sum of:
        0.034778394 = weight(_text_:29 in 2719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034778394 = score(doc=2719,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2719, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2719)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Date: 11. 9.2004 17:40:29

Carlyle, A.: User categorisation of works : toward improved organisation of online catalogue displays (1999) 0.00

0.001932133 = product of:
  0.011592798 = sum of:
    0.011592798 = product of:
      0.034778394 = sum of:
        0.034778394 = weight(_text_:29 in 4612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034778394 = score(doc=4612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14914064 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4612)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Date: 5. 8.2006 13:13:29

Carlyle, A.: Understanding FRBR as a conceptual model : FRBR and the bibliographic universe (2006) 0.00

0.0019147521 = product of:
  0.011488512 = sum of:
    0.011488512 = product of:
      0.034465536 = sum of:
        0.034465536 = weight(_text_:22 in 1050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034465536 = score(doc=1050,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14846832 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1050, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1050)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Date: 10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Carlyle, A.: Matching LCSH and user vocabulary in the library catalog (1989) 0.00
```
0.0015488893 = product of:
  0.0092933355 = sum of:
    0.0092933355 = product of:
      0.027880006 = sum of:
        0.027880006 = weight(_text_:system in 449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027880006 = score(doc=449,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13353272 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 449, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=449)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
```
Abstract

Central to subject searching is the match between user vocabulary and the headings from Library of Congress Subject-Headings (LCSH) used in a library catalog. This paper evaluates previous matching studies, proposes a detailed list of matching categories, and tests LCSH in a study using these categories. Exact and partial match categories are defined for single LCSH and multiple LCSH matches to user expressions. One no-match category is included. Transaction logs from ORION, UCLA's online Information system, were used to collect user expressions for a comparison of LCSH and user language. Results show that single LCSH headings match user expressions exactly about 47% of the time; that single subject heading matches, including exact matches, comprise 74% of the total; that partial matches, to both single and multiple headings, comprise about 21% of the total; and that no match occurs 5% of the time.

Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years

Themes